GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Plauti · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Plauti

26Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CRM data quality for mid-market buyers
Rank 13 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Plauti for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CRM data quality and deduplicationRevenue operations0%13 of 1047%15accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Plauti yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Plauti across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00303
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.502002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Alternative: Plauti for native Salesforce solution with AI recommendations” Mistral Small · CRM data quality · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for Small-Mid Salesforce Orgs ... Limitation: Salesforce-only platform” Kimi K2 · CRM data quality · direct prompt · alternative
“### 3. Plauti - Best for: Small-mid Salesforce organizations” MiniMax M2.5 · CRM data quality · direct prompt · alternative
“The Modern Choice for Prevention & Maintenance: Plauti” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“products like Plauti and DataGroomr show recurring mentions of complexity / learning difficulty in user feedback summaries” GPT-5.4 mini · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Plauti, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plauti was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DemandTools24 of 266Not in the top three
ZoomInfo Operations22 of 266Not in the top three
Insycle17 of 2610Not in the top three
Dedupely16 of 260Not in the top three
Cloudingo13 of 261Not in the top three
Informatica11 of 261Not in the top three
Cleanlist9 of 262Not in the top three
DataGroomr9 of 260Not in the top three
Apollo.io8 of 260Not in the top three
DataMatch Enterprise7 of 260Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plauti. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 26 answers that named Plauti and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Plauti

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Plauti; a claim can dispute any of them.
Plauti (Deduplicate) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plauti's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plauti, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at plauti.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.