Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 42 of 63, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedPega
10Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Pega was named 3 times in Automation & iPaaS, where Workato led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business46 of 68
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market51 of 67
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 101
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pega for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow automation and iPaaS | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 51 of 67 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Workato at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pega held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Automation & iPaaS · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 48 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 79 → 26 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automation & iPaaS | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 51 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pega across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pega across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why to Avoid: They are notoriously difficult to implement, expensive to license” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pega, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pega was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pega, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pega was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pega. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 10 answers that named Pega and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
technologyadvice.com4
larksuite.com3
seampoint.com3
activepieces.com2
albato.com2
helpdesk.com2
kanerika.com2
munro.agency2
ones.com2
teamwork.com2
Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Pega came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pega.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pega takes 0% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pega.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pega takes 0% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“pega”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4,513 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 39,887 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,728 · 599 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,374
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 67 in automation & ipaas
Segment leader
28%
Workato
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 5 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pega.com
9,258
subdomains included
Content
3,013
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,585
Product · Integration
87 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,785 | 25 | 2026-09-24 | CRM, CLM | |
| News or press | 553 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | CRM, CLM | |
| Conference or event | 316 | 20 | 2026-11-30 | CRM | |
| Case study | 307 | 12 | 2026-09-10 | Direct mail | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | 0 | 2026-04-21 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 2 | 2026-07-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-30Aws reinvent 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-13Dial ai dont bet business conference or event
- 2026-10-12Pega cloud blr expert circle meetup conference or event
- 2026-10-0811 customer engagement summit toronto conference or event
- 2026-09-24Conversation greg kihlstr%C3%B6m and tara dezao customer journey management blog
- 2026-09-23Three keys enterprise ai success blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- June 13, 2027 to June 15, 2027PegaWorld 2027Las Vegas · hosts
Last twelve months
- October 20, 2026PEGAInnovate TorontoDesign Exchange, Toronto, Canada · hosted
- September 10, 2026PEGAInnovate Stockholm 2026Grand Hôtel, Stockholm · hosted
- August 27, 2026PEGAInnovate Tokyo 2026ANA Intercontinental Hotel Tokyo, Tokyo · hosted
As the event pages on pega.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pega.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (22); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Pega
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pega; a claim can dispute any of them.
PEGA 1
Follow Pega
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pega is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pega is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The leading AI-powered platform for enterprise transformation
- For
- enterprise
- Free plan or trial
- Platform Trial pega.com
- Integrations claimed
- 16 pega.com/products/decision-hub/integrations
- Certifications
- SOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 42001ISO 22301:2019ISO 9001CSAPCI
- Customers named
- HealthFirstCiscoWells FargoDeutsche BahnDeutsche TelekomWaterNSWUnumAflac
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What Pega's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pega.com, trust.pega.com, pega.com/platform-trial, pega.com/customers, pega.com/products/decision-hub/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pega's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pega, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pega by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pega is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pega, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.