GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Partnero · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Partnero

14Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Partnero was named 5 times in Referrals and 2 other categories, where PartnerStack led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In referrals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Partnero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel0%40 of 1070%3under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%
Affiliate and partner managementPartner and channel0%48 of 870%1under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%
Loyalty, advocacy and referralsMarketing0%68 of 1240%1under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Partnero yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Partnero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for SMB and mid-market teams that want flexible loyalty and referral programs without enterprise complexity” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Referrals · direct prompt · alternative
“Partnero: $59/month with 30-day free trial” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Loyalty · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Partnero, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Partnero was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
impact.com6 of 141Not in the top three
Tapfiliate5 of 142Not in the top three
FirstPromoter5 of 140Not in the top three
Referral Rock5 of 140Not in the top three
ReferralCandy4 of 142Not in the top three
PartnerStack3 of 141Not in the top three
Post Affiliate Pro3 of 141Not in the top three
ReferralHero3 of 141Not in the top three
LoyaltyLion3 of 140Not in the top three
Rewardful3 of 140Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Partnero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 14 answers that named Partnero and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

influencermarketinghub.com3
linkjolt.io3
extole.com2
modash.io2
partnero.comYour site2
postaffiliatepro.com2
referly.so2
referralcandy.com2
worldmetrics.org2
adamconnell.me1

Nineteen of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Partnero came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Partnero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Partnero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at partnero.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack