GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Mindmatrix PRM · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Mindmatrix PRM

6Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mindmatrix PRM was named 4 times in PRM and 1 other category, where Channeltivity led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business52 of 60

under the label threshold

Mid-market49 of 50

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mindmatrix PRM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	49 of 50	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	98 of 108	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mindmatrix PRM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mindmatrix PRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“worth a look if you want a more unified partner operating system with PRM + channel marketing” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Consider avoiding... Mindmatrix, Channeltivity (limited customization)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · negative prompt · hard negative

“### 2. Mindmatrix PRM Major Red Flags:” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PRM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Advanced reporting depends on consistent campaign tagging” Mistral Small · Channel marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mindmatrix PRM, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindmatrix PRM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Impartner PRM5 of 61Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM5 of 60Not in the top three

Channelscaler4 of 60Not in the top three

Kiflo4 of 60Not in the top three

PartnerStack4 of 60Not in the top three

Introw2 of 61Not in the top three

PartnerPortal.io2 of 61Not in the top three

Channeltivity2 of 60Not in the top three

ZINFI Unified Partner Management2 of 60Not in the top three

impact.com2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindmatrix PRM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 6 answers that named Mindmatrix PRM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com1

learn.g2.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Mindmatrix PRM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/partner-ecosystem-platforms/themes/partner-relationship-management1

g2.com/products/impartner-prm/reviews1

learn.g2.com/best-prm-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindmatrix PRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindmatrix PRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mindmatrix.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.