Index › Products › Local Falcon · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Local Falcon

5Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Local Falcon was named 2 times in Local listings, where BrightLocal led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business25 of 51

under the label threshold

Mid-market51 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprise40 of 53

under the label threshold

In local listings · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Local Falcon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Local listings management	Marketing	0%	51 of 65	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by BrightLocal at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Local Falcon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Local Falcon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Focused on rank tracking only — you'd need to stitch together multiple tools.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Local listings · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Local Falcon, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Local Falcon was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Yext5 of 50Not among the top eight

BrightLocal4 of 51Not among the top eight

Birdeye3 of 51Not among the top eight

Moz Local3 of 51Not among the top eight

Localo3 of 50Not among the top eight

Google Business Profile1 of 51Not among the top eight

Impartner PRM1 of 51Not among the top eight

SEMrush Local Toolkit1 of 51Not among the top eight

SOCi1 of 50Not among the top eight

Salesforce PRM1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Local Falcon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Local Falcon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

birdeye.com4

g2.com3

guideflow.com3

arc4.com2

merchynt.com2

nathanojaokomo.com2

searchatlas.com2

semrush.com2

soci.ai2

thestacc.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Local Falcon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/local-seo3

arc4.com/resources/local-listing-management2

birdeye.com/blog/best-local-seo-tools2

birdeye.com/blog/local-listing-management-tools2

guideflow.com/blog/local-listing-management-software-tools2

guideflow.com/blog/local-marketing-software-tools2

nathanojaokomo.com/blog/best-local-seo-tools2

soci.ai/blog/best-local-seo-platforms-for-multi-location-businesses-in-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Local Falcon

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Local Falcon; a claim can dispute any of them.

Local Falcon / Localo 1

Follow Local Falcon

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Local Falcon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Local Falcon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Local Falcon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Local Falcon is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Local Falcon, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.