GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › LeadDyno · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

LeadDyno

25Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Affiliate for small business buyers
Rank 30 of 87 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LeadDyno for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Affiliate and partner managementPartner and channel0%30 of 8725%4under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LeadDyno yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LeadDyno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“General low-cost paid option: LeadDyno (~$49/month starter after 30-day trial)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · budget prompt · alternative
“Specifically recommended for simple stores on a budget” MiniMax M2.5 · Affiliate · budget prompt · alternative
“3. LeadDyno - Best for E-commerce” Mistral Small · Affiliate · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“or e-comm-focused like Refersion/LeadDyno” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LeadDyno, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeadDyno was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tapfiliate24 of 257Not in the top three
Rewardful17 of 252Not in the top three
Refersion16 of 252Not in the top three
PartnerStack16 of 251Not in the top three
impact.com15 of 250Not in the top three
FirstPromoter12 of 251Not in the top three
Post Affiliate Pro10 of 251Not in the top three
ShareASale6 of 250Not in the top three
Awin4 of 251Not in the top three
Amazon Associates4 of 250Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeadDyno. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 25 answers that named LeadDyno and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ainfluencer.com2
learn.g2.com2
modash.io2
pipedrive.com2
referralcandy.com2
shopify.com2
tapfiliate.com2
bitly.com1
brandchamp.io1
dustinhowes.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming LeadDyno came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeadDyno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeadDyno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leaddyno.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack