Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 13 of 56
2 categories · RankedLeadDyno
18Judge labels
3First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Affiliate for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 94 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 57
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market9 of 94
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise40 of 48
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LeadDyno for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliate and partner management | Partner and channel | 4% | 9 of 94 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 49% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 84 of 112 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, LeadDyno held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Affiliate · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 30 → 8 of 90
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 of 46, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliate | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 9 of 94 |
| Referrals | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 112, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LeadDyno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LeadDyno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LeadDyno or FirstPromoter at ~$49/month are your most cost-effective dedicated options” Kimi K2 · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice
“or Tapfiliate / LeadDyno if you want simple software for running your own program” Perplexity Sonar · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice
“then graduating to ShareASale or LeadDyno as you need more features” MiniMax M2.5 · Affiliate · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeadDyno, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeadDyno was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeadDyno, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeadDyno was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeadDyno. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named LeadDyno and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
modash.io13
tapfiliate.com12
postaffiliatepro.com10
influencermarketinghub.com9
learn.g2.com8
shopify.com8
g2.com6
resources.rework.com5
tracknow.io5
blog.hubspot.com3
Seventy-nine of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming LeadDyno came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leaddyno.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LeadDyno takes 4% of first choices and PartnerStack takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leaddyno.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LeadDyno takes 4% of first choices and PartnerStack takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “affiliate marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best affiliate marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“leaddyno”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,233 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 428 · 24 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,804
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 94 in affiliate
Segment leader
49%
PartnerStack
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leaddyno.com
186
subdomains included
Content
150
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 6
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 86 | 12 | 2026-09-28 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 47 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 9 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Affiliate marketing on instagram blog
- 2026-09-22Social media platforms for affiliate marketing blog
- 2026-09-17Affiliate email marketing blog
- 2026-09-09Is affiliate marketing dead blog
- 2026-09-01Best affiliate tracking software dtc brands blog
- 2026-08-25Ai rules for affiliate marketing eu ai act guide blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leaddyno.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow LeadDyno
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LeadDyno is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LeadDyno is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Leading Affiliate Marketing Software to Grow Your Brand
- For
- brands
- Price stated
- Lite $49; Essential $129; Advanced $349; Unlimited $749 leaddyno.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 49 leaddyno.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 30-day free trial leaddyno.com
- Integrations claimed
- 25 leaddyno.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GetApp Category LeaderGDPR Compliance
- Customers named
- LodgifyBeddysRevelation HealthSynergy ScienceSnappaShine CosmeticsCents of StyleLogoJet
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What LeadDyno's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: leaddyno.com, leaddyno.com, leaddyno.com/pricing, leaddyno.com/features/dashboard, leaddyno.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeadDyno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeadDyno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LeadDyno by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LeadDyno is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LeadDyno, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.