GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Keygrip · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Keygrip

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Keygrip was named 4 times in SEO, where Surfer SEO led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market12 of 113

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In seo · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Keygrip for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SEO and content optimization platforms	Marketing	2%	12 of 113	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Surfer SEO at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Keygrip yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Keygrip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Keygrip for AEO + SEO visibility and content execution” Llama 4 Maverick · SEO · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Keygrip, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Keygrip was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Surfer SEO4 of 41Not in the top three

Ahrefs4 of 40Not in the top three

Clearscope4 of 40Not in the top three

Semrush3 of 42Not in the top three

MarketMuse2 of 40Not in the top three

Screaming Frog2 of 40Not in the top three

Botify1 of 40Not in the top three

BrightEdge1 of 40Not in the top three

Conductor1 of 40Not in the top three

Moz1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Keygrip. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 4 answers that named Keygrip and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aeoengine.ai1

airops.com1

blog.hubspot.com1

causalfunnel.com1

claritydigital.agency1

digitalsyncnow.com1

directiveconsulting.com1

frizerly.com1

honeyb.ai1

keygrip.aiYour site1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Keygrip came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aeoengine.ai/blog/best-saas-seo-tools1

airops.com/blog/seo-automation-tools1

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/b2b-seo-tools1

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/content-optimization-tools1

causalfunnel.com/blog/12-essential-b2b-seo-tools-to-boost-your-business-growth-in-20251

claritydigital.agency/blog/best-aeo-geo-tools-20261

digitalsyncnow.com/Blog/best-content-marketing-seo-tools-20261

directiveconsulting.com/blog/15-b2b-seo-tools-every-revenue-team-should-use-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Keygrip's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Keygrip, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at keygrip.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.