GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Intellimize · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Intellimize

8Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Intellimize was named 4 times in Experimentation, where VWO led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business63 of 91

under the label threshold

Mid-market66 of 69

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 53

under the label threshold

In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intellimize for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	0%	66 of 69	75%	4	under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intellimize yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intellimize across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“You want AI/ML-driven automated optimization with minimal manual segmentation” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Intellimize was acquired by Webflow and rebranded as Webflow Optimize. It is now highly locked into the Webflow Enterprise ecosystem” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · direct prompt · soft negative

“Strong AI-driven personalization and ABM capabilities, but quote-based and skews toward mid-market/enterprise budgets.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Experimentation · direct prompt · soft negative

“Caution on Support & Flexibility ... users have reported a noticeable dip in customer support quality” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intellimize, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intellimize was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

VWO7 of 83Not in the top three

Mutiny7 of 81Not in the top three

Optimizely CMS4 of 81Not in the top three

Adobe Target3 of 80Not in the top three

GrowthBook2 of 80Not in the top three

Kameleoon2 of 80Not in the top three

Optimizely Web Experimentation2 of 80Not in the top three

Userled2 of 80Not in the top three

Webflow Optimize2 of 80Not in the top three

Convert Experiences1 of 81Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as Intellimize

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Intellimize; a claim can dispute any of them.

Intellimize / Webflow Optimize 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intellimize's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intellimize, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intellimize.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.