GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Integrately · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Integrately

12Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Integrately was named 9 times in Automation & iPaaS, where Workato led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Integrately for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaSGTM data and infrastructure0%13 of 7611%9under 10 labels · led by Workato at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Integrately yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Integrately across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200213
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Integrately is an affordable automation platform positioning itself as a simpler, cheaper alternative to Zapier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Automation & iPaaS · budget prompt · alternative
“Low-Volume/Simple: Integrately or Pabbly Connect (flat pricing, reliable basics)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · alternative
“frequently cited as affordable alternatives to Zapier” MiniMax M2.5 · Automation & iPaaS · budget prompt · alternative
“Best Zapier Alternative” Mistral Small · Automation & iPaaS · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Past security incident raised concerns about data handling” Kimi K2 · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Integrately, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Integrately was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zapier12 of 122Not in the top three
n8n12 of 122Not in the top three
Make11 of 125Not in the top three
Pabbly Connect9 of 121Not in the top three
Activepieces6 of 120Not in the top three
Microsoft Power Automate6 of 120Not in the top three
Pipedream5 of 120Not in the top three
Workato5 of 120Not in the top three
IFTTT3 of 120Not in the top three
Tray.ai3 of 120Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Integrately. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 12 answers that named Integrately and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Integrately's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Integrately, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at integrate.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack