GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Heyflow · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Heyflow

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Heyflow was named 2 times in Landing pages, where Unbounce led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business29 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprise15 of 76

under the label threshold

In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Heyflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Landing pages and interactive content	Marketing	0%	21 of 78	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Heyflow yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Heyflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Heyflow ($22+/mo) - Excellent for personalized landing pages with calculator widgets” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Heyflow, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Heyflow was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Unbounce4 of 42Not in the top three

Leadpages3 of 40Not in the top three

HubSpot Landing Pages2 of 40Not in the top three

Instapage2 of 40Not in the top three

Landingi2 of 40Not in the top three

Outgrow1 of 41Not in the top three

Ceros1 of 40Not in the top three

Convert Calculator1 of 40Not in the top three

Convertri1 of 40Not in the top three

Framer1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Heyflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 4 answers that named Heyflow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

heyflow.comYour site2

perspective.co2

ventureharbour.com2

cmswire.com1

convertri.com1

emailvendorselection.com1

industryaihub.com1

klaviyo.com1

kleap.co1

landerlab.io1

Eleven of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Heyflow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

heyflow.com/blog/landing-page-builder2

ventureharbour.com/best-landing-page-builders2

cmswire.com/marketing-automation/12-enterprise-landing-page-builders-for-marketers1

convertri.com/best-landing-page-builder1

emailvendorselection.com/best-landing-page-builders1

industryaihub.com/hubspot-vs-unbounce-vs-instapage-b2b-landing-pages1

klaviyo.com/blog/best-landing-page-builders1

kleap.co/blog/8-best-ai-landing-page-builders-in-2026-tested-ranked1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Heyflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Heyflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at heyflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.