GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Fortra · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Fortra

8Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fortra was named 2 times in Brand protection, where Red Points led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 92

under the label threshold

Mid-market29 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprise53 of 64

under the label threshold

In brand protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fortra for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Brand protection platforms	Marketing	0%	29 of 84	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Red Points at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fortra yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fortra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A broader suite with dark web + brand monitoring: Fortra or BrandShield” GPT-5.4 mini · Brand protection · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fortra, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fortra was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Red Points8 of 85Not among the top eight

Netcraft6 of 80Not among the top eight

Corsearch5 of 81Not among the top eight

ZeroFox5 of 81Not among the top eight

BrandShield5 of 80Not among the top eight

Bolster3 of 80Not among the top eight

IP Moat1 of 81Not among the top eight

MarkMonitor – Clarivate1 of 81Not among the top eight

BrandMentions1 of 80Not among the top eight

CybelAngel1 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fortra. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Fortra and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

redpoints.com8

fortra.comYour site4

guideflow.com4

brandshield.com3

netcraft.com3

expertinsights.com2

g2.com2

gartner.com2

geekflare.com2

ipzest.app2

Twenty-eight of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Fortra came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

redpoints.com/blog/best-brand-protection-software6

guideflow.com/blog/brand-protection-software4

fortra.com/platform/brand-protection3

redpoints.com/brand-protection-software3

brandshield.com/2

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-brand-protection-solutions2

gartner.com/reviews/market/brand-protection-software2

geekflare.com/reviews/brand-protection-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

fortra.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fortra takes 0% of first choices and Red Points takes 40%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “brand protection platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best brand protection platform”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 125,581 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 18,051 · 898 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 8,577
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $34 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 96 text, 20 image, 4 video · 60 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2022, as Fortra, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 45 in the year, 75 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 29 of 84 in brand protection

Segment leader

40%

Red Points

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 8 answers
Its own site cited: in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on fortra.com

5,294

subdomains included

Content

3,329

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

347 · 11

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Blog	2,245	undated
Report or ebook	371	undated
News or press	368	undated
Podcast or video	142	undated
Case study	85	undated
Comparison	40	undated
Glossary or explainer	38	undated
Webinar or virtual event	19	undated
Template or tool	13	undated
Conference or event	8	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fortra.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Fortra

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Fortra is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-Amplified Data Security Platform
fortra.com
For: Every organization has unique cybersecurity needs
fortra.com/pricing
Price stated: simple, tiered pricing fortra.com/pricing
Customers named: American ExpressBoseCargillCocaColaDelta Air LinesFedexGoldman SachsGodaddy
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Fortra's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: fortra.com, fortra.com/pricing, trust.fortra.com, fortra.com/platform, fortra.com/platform/brand-protection/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fortra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fortra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fortra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Fortra is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fortra, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.