Index › Products › Expo Pass · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Expo Pass

9Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Expo Pass was named 2 times in Event lead capture and 1 other category, where Blinq led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 70

under the label threshold

Mid-market38 of 70

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In event lead capture · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Expo Pass for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Event lead capture apps	Marketing	0%	38 of 70	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23%
Event management platforms	Marketing	0%	38 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Bizzabo at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Expo Pass yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Expo Pass across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Budget-friendly straightforward retrieval: Expo Pass ... the simple, budget-conscious option” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“worth considering if onsite check-in, badge printing, and lead scanning are core priorities” GPT-5.4 mini · Event management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Expo Pass, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Expo Pass was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Blinq4 of 91Not among the top eight

Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App3 of 91Not among the top eight

Mobly Capture3 of 91Not among the top eight

Zoho Backstage Lead Retrieval3 of 90Not among the top eight

iCapture3 of 90Not among the top eight

BoothIQ2 of 92Not among the top eight

Captello2 of 90Not among the top eight

Cvent LeadCapture2 of 90Not among the top eight

Popl2 of 90Not among the top eight

Zuddl2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Expo Pass. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Expo Pass and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wizcommerce.com8

b2brain.com5

zuddl.com5

blinq.me4

eventsair.com4

g2.com4

capterra.com3

eventify.io3

getmobly.com3

guideflow.com3

No domain is on file for Expo Pass, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

wizcommerce.com/blog/best-trade-show-app8

zuddl.com/blog/top-9-trade-show-lead-capture-apps5

eventsair.com/blog/best-lead-retrieval-app-for-trade-shows4

b2brain.com/blogs/best-app-for-events3

b2brain.com/blogs/free-lead-capture-app3

blinq.me/blog/best-event-lead-capture-software-20263

eventify.io/blog/best-lead-retrieval-software3

g2.com/categories/event-lead-capture/small-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Expo Pass

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Expo Pass's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Expo Pass, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Expo Pass by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Expo Pass is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Expo Pass, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.