Every category where a model named Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Event lead capture apps	Marketing	4%	10 of 70	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	3	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels3

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best budget-friendly paid plan: Eventleaf ... it's the most cited budget-friendly lead retrieval app” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · budget prompt · first choice

“the best event lead capture app is Eventleaf” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Event lead capture · budget prompt · first choice

“if you're at trade shows specifically, Eventleaf's free starter tier with bundled lead retrieval is hard to beat” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Event lead capture · budget prompt · alternative

“scans badges, rates leads, adds notes, exports contacts. Only works within Eventleaf-managed events.” Kimi K2 · Event lead capture · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Examples: Cvent LeadCapture, Whova, Eventleaf... they do not work universally” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event lead capture · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Blinq15 of 229Not among the top eight

Mobly Capture12 of 227Not among the top eight

Popl11 of 223Not among the top eight

Wave Connect10 of 222Not among the top eight

iCapture10 of 221Not among the top eight

Cvent LeadCapture10 of 220Not among the top eight

Captello7 of 221Not among the top eight

Whova7 of 220Not among the top eight

momencio6 of 221Not among the top eight

B2Brain5 of 221Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blinq.me17

g2.com17

b2brain.com15

guideflow.com15

mobilocard.com15

wavecnct.com13

getmobly.com11

accelevents.com10

learn.g2.com9

eventify.io8

130 of the 130 domain citations in answers naming Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blinq.me/blog/best-event-lead-capture-software-202615

mobilocard.com/post/whats-the-best-event-lead-generation-software15

guideflow.com/blog/trade-show-lead-software13

wavecnct.com/blogs/best-tools-lead-capture-trade-shows13

g2.com/categories/event-lead-capture/small-business11

getmobly.com/post/best-event-lead-capture-app11

accelevents.com/blog/7-best-event-lead-capture-software-for-enhanced-lead-generation9

eventify.io/blog/best-lead-retrieval-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

eventleaf.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App takes 4% of first choices and Blinq takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “event lead capture app”

Position for “best event lead capture app”

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“eventleaf lead retrieval app”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 8,466 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,529 · 234 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,964
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 70 in event lead capture

Segment leader

23%

Blinq

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on eventleaf.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Conference or event	7	undated
Comparison	4	undated
Webinar or virtual event	2	undated
Blog	1	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page eventleaf.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App; a claim can dispute any of them.

Eventleaf 11

Follow Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.