Every category where a model named Zuddl for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Event lead capture apps	Marketing	0%	27 of 70	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23%
Event management platforms	Marketing	0%	20 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Bizzabo at 28%
Webinar and virtual event platforms	Marketing	0%	28 of 67	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zuddl yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zuddl across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best All-in-One Platform ... Great if you want one platform that handles both event management and lead capture” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Event lead capture · direct prompt · alternative

“or Zuddl if you're planning more complex virtual events with networking elements” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Webinars · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“consider Zuddl, Whova, or SpotMe-style platforms” Muse Glimmer 30B · Webinars · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for consolidating your entire event stack” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zuddl, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zuddl was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bizzabo10 of 222Not among the top eight

Mobly Capture8 of 222Not among the top eight

Blinq7 of 221Not among the top eight

momencio7 of 221Not among the top eight

iCapture7 of 220Not among the top eight

Cvent Event Marketing & Management6 of 222Not among the top eight

B2Brain6 of 221Not among the top eight

Captello6 of 220Not among the top eight

Popl6 of 220Not among the top eight

BoothIQ5 of 220Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zuddl. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Zuddl and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zuddl.comYour site17

b2brain.com8

bizzabo.com8

g2.com8

learn.g2.com8

blinq.me7

eventsair.com6

invitedesk.com6

whova.com6

easywebinar.com5

Sixty-two of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming Zuddl came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

b2brain.com/blogs/best-app-for-events8

zuddl.com/blog/best-event-registration-software6

blinq.me/blog/best-event-lead-capture-software-20265

mobilocard.com/post/whats-the-best-event-lead-generation-software5

zuddl.com/blog/best-virtual-event-platforms-large-scale-attendee-experiences5

zuddl.com/blog/top-9-trade-show-lead-capture-apps5

bizzabo.com/blog/best-lead-capture-apps-for-events4

getmobly.com/post/best-event-lead-capture-app4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zuddl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Zuddl takes 0% of first choices and Blinq takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “event lead capture app”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best event lead capture app”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“zuddl”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 16 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 811 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 311 · 25 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,498
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 11 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2025, as JOYN EXPERIENCES INC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 8 in the year, 3 before. 6 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 27 of 70 in event lead capture

Segment leader

23%

Blinq

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on zuddl.com

2,138

subdomains included

Content

934

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,044

Product · Integration

25 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Webinar or virtual event	333	3	2026-09-04	SEO
Blog	226	15	2026-09-17	Mobile apps, Landing pages
Conference or event	216	2	2026-09-03	ABM, Mobile apps
News or press	53	undated
Case study	26	undated
Report or ebook	24	undated
Podcast or video	20	undated
Glossary or explainer	15	undated		CRM
Template or tool	11	0	2025-08-04
Comparison	10	0	2025-04-10

Most recent

2026-09-17Zuddl bw events partnership blog
2026-09-04Top 13 virtual summit tools for b2b enterprise marketing teams webinar or virtual event
2026-09-0310 best event analytics platforms for b2b event teams blog
2026-09-0312 best hybrid conference platforms for b2b event teams conference or event
2026-09-0312 best speaker management software for b2b event teams blog
2026-09-0313 best on demand webinar platforms for b2b event teams webinar or virtual event

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zuddl.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Zuddl

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zuddl is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: #1 Modular Event Management Software for B2B Events; a unified event management software designed for conferences, field events, and webinars developed for strategic event marketers that scale with your event program needs.
zuddl.com
For: B2B event marketing teams; strategic event marketers
zuddl.com
Price stated: Starts at $10,000/year for two organizers zuddl.com/pricing
Starting price: 10000/year zuddl.com/pricing
Certifications: ISO 27001GDPR-compliantSOC 2SOC 2 Type IISSOSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27701:2019
Hosting: USEU
Customers named: FullscriptExit FiveZyloMotivePartnership LeadersBandwidthCreatorIQQS
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial, integrations

What Zuddl's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zuddl.com, zuddl.com/pricing, trust.zuddl.com, zuddl.com/platform/ai-agents, zuddl.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zuddl's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zuddl, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zuddl by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Zuddl is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zuddl, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.