AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Eventleaf · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Eventleaf

6Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Eventleaf was named 3 times in Event management, where Bizzabo led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In event management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Eventleaf for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Event management platformsMarketing2%11 of 810%3under 10 labels · led by Bizzabo at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Eventleaf yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Eventleaf across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“starting with a free tier option like Eventleaf or RSVPify allows you to test the platform before committing financially” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Event management · budget prompt · first choice
“Free tiers for small events (e.g., up to 100 attendees/year or 50/event); good for basic needs without ticketing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Event management · budget prompt · alternative
“Eventleaf unlocks all features for events under 20 registrations at no cost.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Eventleaf, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eventleaf was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Eventbrite4 of 62Not among the top eight
Bizzabo3 of 60Not among the top eight
RSVPify3 of 60Not among the top eight
Zoho Backstage2 of 61Not among the top eight
Cvent Event Marketing & Management2 of 60Not among the top eight
Eventzilla2 of 60Not among the top eight
Swoogo2 of 60Not among the top eight
Sunfish Events1 of 61Not among the top eight
Whova1 of 61Not among the top eight
Accelevents1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eventleaf. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Eventleaf and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eventify.io6
capterra.com4
eventee.com3
learn.g2.com3
bizzabo.com2
dryfta.com2
eventleaf.comYour site2
eventsair.com2
perfectvenue.com2
resources.rework.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Eventleaf came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

eventleaf.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Eventleaf takes 2% of first choices and Bizzabo takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “event management platform”
3
Position for “best event management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 8,466 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,529 · 234 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,964
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 81 in event management
Segment leader
28%
Bizzabo
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on eventleaf.com
16
subdomains included
Content
15
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Conference or event7undated
Comparison4undated
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Blog1undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page eventleaf.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Eventleaf

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Eventleaf is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the easy-to-use all-in-one event management software for event planning, registration, and attendee engagement for all types of business events, whether in-person, hybrid, or virtual
For
business events
Price stated
pricing that fits any budget eventleaf.com
Free plan or trial
Try For Free eventleaf.com
Customers named
AccentureColumbia UniversitySyscoWorldpayPlug and Play Tech CenterInternational Cleaning Experts ExpoEmbassy of SpainAssociation of British Dispensing Opticians
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Eventleaf's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: eventleaf.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eventleaf's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eventleaf, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eventleaf by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Eventleaf is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Eventleaf, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eventleaf.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.