Every category where a model named Dropbox Sign for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	18 of 65	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dropbox Sign yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dropbox Sign across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase15 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Dropbox Sign / HelloSign if: You're a smaller team needing simple, affordable, unlimited signatures” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“$15-50/month with unlimited signing... Best for: Teams wanting simplicity without transaction limits” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CLM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Simple, unlimited e-signing ... weaker on full contract management/editing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CLM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“DocuSign or Dropbox Sign for signatures” GPT-5.4 mini · CLM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dropbox Sign, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dropbox Sign was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc16 of 1712Not in the top three

DocuSign12 of 170Not in the top three

Ironclad6 of 170Not in the top three

Juro5 of 170Not in the top three

Concord4 of 171Not in the top three

GetAccept4 of 171Not in the top three

Adobe Acrobat Sign4 of 170Not in the top three

ContractSafe3 of 171Not in the top three

Proposify3 of 170Not in the top three

signNow3 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dropbox Sign. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 17 answers that named Dropbox Sign and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eversign.com2

getaccept.com2

pandadoc.com2

proposify.com2

worksbuddy.ai2

albato.com1

appvizer.com1

boloforms.com1

business.adobe.com1

docusign.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Dropbox Sign came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

eversign.com/blog/best-free-and-low-cost-e-signature-software-for-small-businesses2

proposify.com/blog/best-e-signature-software2

albato.com/blog/publications/best-e-signature-software1

appvizer.com/magazine/collaboration/electronic-signature/best-electronic-signature-for-sma1

boloforms.com/blog/best-e-signature-tools-for-small-teams1

business.adobe.com/products/sign-solutions.html1

docusign.com/products/electronic-signature1

ezsignly.com/blogs/top-10-esignature-tools-for-us-businesses-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Dropbox Sign

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Dropbox Sign; a claim can dispute any of them.

Dropbox Sign (formerly HelloSign) 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dropbox Sign's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dropbox Sign, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dropboxsign.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.