GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Crownpeak · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Crownpeak

11Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Crownpeak was named 5 times in Website governance and 1 other category, where Siteimprove led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market69 of 98

under the label threshold

Enterprise49 of 84

under the label threshold

In website governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Crownpeak for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Website governance and accessibility	Marketing	0%	69 of 98	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25%
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	43 of 52	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Osano at 31%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Crownpeak yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Crownpeak across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“often favored by highly regulated industries (like finance and healthcare) for its robust documentation and audit trails” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“common complaints across the largest platforms (including Siteimprove, Crownpeak, and others) include: Slow performance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · negative prompt · soft negative

“do not publish their pricing and require a sales quote” Mistral Small · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Crownpeak, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Crownpeak was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Siteimprove6 of 113Not among the top eight

OneTrust6 of 111Not among the top eight

Silktide5 of 114Not among the top eight

AudioEye5 of 110Not among the top eight

Deque axe Platform4 of 110Not among the top eight

TrustArc4 of 110Not among the top eight

UserWay4 of 110Not among the top eight

Osano3 of 111Not among the top eight

Acquia Web Governance3 of 110Not among the top eight

Cookiebot3 of 110Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Crownpeak. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Crownpeak and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com5

silktide.com5

testparty.ai5

webtonic.io5

guideflow.com4

secureprivacy.ai4

us.fitgap.com4

wifitalents.com4

worldmetrics.org4

accessibilitycloud.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Crownpeak came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

silktide.com/blog/best-web-governance-platforms5

webtonic.io/blog/best-website-accessibility-ada-tools5

guideflow.com/blog/digital-accessibility-software4

secureprivacy.ai/blog/best-cmp-20264

worldmetrics.org/best/web-governance-software4

accessibilitycloud.com/the-digital-accessibility-platform-landscape-16-platforms-reviewed3

accessible.org/top-accessibility-software-market3

designrush.com/agency/it-services/trends/best-consent-management-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Crownpeak

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Crownpeak; a claim can dispute any of them.

Crownpeak/DQM 1

Follow Crownpeak

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Crownpeak's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Crownpeak, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Crownpeak by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Crownpeak is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Crownpeak, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.