Every category where a model named Centify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	0%	11 of 51	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Centify yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Centify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Centify if your company is headquartered in Europe and requires strict data residency compliance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Commissions · comparative prompt · alternative

“Centify is the only platform on this list that pairs a no-code plan builder with EU data residency” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Commissions · comparative prompt · alternative

“European or GDPR-sensitive orgs should look at Centify or Qobra (EU hosting).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: European & SaaS teams moving off Excel” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Commissions · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Centify, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Centify was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CaptivateIQ19 of 204Not in the top three

Salesforce Spiff18 of 201Not in the top three

QuotaPath17 of 207Not in the top three

Everstage15 of 207Not in the top three

Qobra15 of 202Not in the top three

Performio11 of 200Not in the top three

Xactly10 of 201Not in the top three

Varicent6 of 200Not in the top three

EasyComp5 of 201Not in the top three

Xactly Incent5 of 201Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Centify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 20 answers that named Centify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cmsreport.com1

everstage.com1

getcentify.com1

qcommission.com1

qobra.co1

socpub.com1

technologyadvice.com1

Seven of the seven domain citations in answers naming Centify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cmsreport.com/articles/top-8-sales-commission-management-software-2026-181511

everstage.com/10-best-sales-commission-software1

getcentify.com/best-sales-commission-software1

qcommission.com/blog/top-6-sales-commission-software-in-2026.html1

qobra.co/blog/top-sales-commission-tools1

socpub.com/articles/top-8-sales-commission-management-software-2026-181511

technologyadvice.com/blog/sales/best-sales-commission-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Centify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Centify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at centify.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.