Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 42 → 15 of 52
2 categories · Named, not rankedBidsketch
10Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bidsketch was named 7 times in Proposals and 1 other category, where PandaDoc led with 65%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 53
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market56 of 56
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise67 of 67
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In proposals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Bidsketch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 56 of 56 | 83% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 53 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Bidsketch held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Proposals · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 74 → 55 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 69 → 62 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposals | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 74 → 56 of 56 |
| RFP response | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Bidsketch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Bidsketch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“great for small teams who need structure without too much complexity. From $29/month.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Proposals · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Often called out for not keeping up with modern design expectations, lacking polish in templates and UI.” Grok 4.20 · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Bidsketch if you need modern design flexibility, real-time collaboration and broad integrations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“it has not kept pace with modern design expectations and may feel outdated compared to newer tools” Mistral Small · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“Bidsketch - received negative feedback from users.” Llama 4 Maverick · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bidsketch, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bidsketch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bidsketch, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bidsketch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bidsketch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Bidsketch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
responsive.io7
articsledge.com5
g2.com5
guideflow.com5
pandadoc.com5
qwilr.com5
alexberman.com4
gtm-ai-index.com4
proposify.com4
storyflow.so4
Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Bidsketch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on bidsketch.com
94
subdomains included
Content
1
counted in the table below
Documentation
56
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page bidsketch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Bidsketch
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bidsketch; a claim can dispute any of them.
BidSketch 1
Follow Bidsketch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Bidsketch is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Bidsketch is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- proposal software
- For
- salespeople, sales teams, and anyone closing deals
- Price stated
- Business Yearly $119/mo; Team Yearly $47/mo; Solo Yearly $23/mo; Business $149/mo; Team $79/mo; Solo $29/mo; starter plan $15/month bidsketch.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 15 bidsketch.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- START FREE TRIAL bidsketch.com
- Customers named
- Angela NielsenOne LilyNathan SuddsTektureDaina ReedJustin Sutton
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Bidsketch's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bidsketch.com, bidsketch.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bidsketch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bidsketch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bidsketch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Bidsketch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bidsketch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.