GTM AI Index

Index › Products › B2B Planr · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

B2B Planr

4Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. B2B Planr was named 1 time in Marketing resource mgt, where Wrike for Marketing led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 107

under the label threshold

Mid-market40 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In marketing resource mgt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named B2B Planr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Marketing resource management	Marketing	0%	40 of 110	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for B2B Planr yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated B2B Planr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best B2B Strategy Tool: B2B Planr” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as B2B Planr, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and B2B Planr was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

monday.com Work Management4 of 42Not among the top eight

HubSpot Marketing Hub3 of 41Not among the top eight

Aprimo2 of 40Not among the top eight

Wrike for Marketing2 of 40Not among the top eight

Adobe Marketo Measure1 of 40Not among the top eight

Asana1 of 40Not among the top eight

ClickUp1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named B2B Planr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named B2B Planr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clickup.com4

g2.com4

learn.g2.com3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com3

b2bplanr.comYour site2

getapp.com2

mailmodo.com2

omr.com2

peerspot.com2

asana.com1

Twenty-three of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming B2B Planr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clickup.com/blog/marketing-resource-management-software3

g2.com/categories/marketing-resource-management3

learn.g2.com/best-marketing-resource-management-software3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-marketing-resource-management-software3

b2bplanr.com/2

clickup.com/blog/b2b-marketing-software2

clickup.com/blog/marketing-management-software-for-small-business2

mailmodo.com/marketing-stash/marketing-resource-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow B2B Planr

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when B2B Planr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as B2B Planr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for B2B Planr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where B2B Planr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name B2B Planr, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.