Every category where a model named Apache Superset for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Dashboards and data visualization	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	12 of 73	0%	10	accepted challenger
Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	47 of 100	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Apache Superset yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Apache Superset across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your team has SQL skills and a developer who can handle the deployment, Apache Superset gives you millions of dollars worth of BI infrastructure for completely free.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · BI & dashboards · budget prompt · alternative

“Best free/open-source option for more technical teams... Tradeoff: usually more technical to deploy and maintain” GPT-5.4 mini · BI & dashboards · budget prompt · alternative

“Most powerful free choice: Apache Superset (for technical teams)” Mistral Small · BI & dashboards · budget prompt · alternative

“For technical teams: Apache Superset or Metabase (free options)” Mistral Small · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Apache Superset, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Apache Superset was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Metabase18 of 195Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI17 of 196Not in the top three

Looker Studio13 of 198Not in the top three

Tableau11 of 191Not in the top three

Looker7 of 190Not in the top three

Domo6 of 190Not in the top three

Zoho Analytics6 of 190Not in the top three

Grafana5 of 190Not in the top three

Qlik Sense5 of 190Not in the top three

Redash5 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Apache Superset. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 19 answers that named Apache Superset and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

darwinapps.com1

fanruan.com1

intl.finebi.com1

ovaledge.com1

selecthub.com1

valiotti.com1

zite.com1

Seven of the seven domain citations in answers naming Apache Superset came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

darwinapps.com/blog/affordable-data-visualization-tools1

fanruan.com/en/blog/best-free-bi-tools1

intl.finebi.com/en-US/blog/dashaboard-software1

ovaledge.com/blog-template-test/the-best-business-intelligence-tools-in-2026-compared-and-1

selecthub.com/c/business-intelligence-tools1

valiotti.com/open-source-business-intelligence-tools1

zite.com/blog/no-code-dashboard1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Apache Software Foundation is the company behind Apache Superset.

Website: apache.org
Headquarters: Wakefield Township, United States
Founded: 1999

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Apache Superset's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Apache Superset, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at apache.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.