GTM AI Index
Index Sales Dialers › CloudTalk vs Allo
Sales dialers and calling · September 2026 Edition

CloudTalk vs Allo

One of twelve models named CloudTalk first on the direct prompt; zero named Allo. CloudTalk was named by twelve of the twelve models and Allo by eleven and CloudTalk carries 38 labels and Allo 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CloudTalk

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Allo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share16%14%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3812A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CloudTalk reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Orum was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Aloware vs CloudTalk · Aloware vs Allo · CloudTalk vs JustCall

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales dialers and calling page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CloudTalkFirst choices, of twelve modelsAllo
Direct10
Paraphrase60
Comparative10
Budget-constrained061 against CloudTalk
Scale-constrained00
Negative011 against CloudTalk
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CloudTalk and Allo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
CloudTalk Allo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CloudTalk on the left and Allo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CloudTalk and Allo stood in it.

CloudTalk first, Allo not the choice

1 of 12 modelsAllo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aloware Power Dialer, CloudTalk alternatives: Nooks, Orum, PhoneBurner, SmartDialer

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarAloware alternatives: CloudTalk, JustCall, Kixie, Nooks, Orum
Grok 4.1 FastAloware, Kixie alternatives: CloudTalk, JustCall, Nooks, Orum
Mistral SmallAloware alternatives: CloudTalk, Nooks, Orum, Skipcall
GLM 4.7 FlashXJustCall alternatives: CloudTalk, Dialpad

Neither was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniSalesloft alternatives: Klenty, Nooks, Orum, Regie.ai
Gemini 3.5 FlashNooks, Orum alternatives: Aloware, Kixie, PhoneBurner
DeepSeek V4 FlashNooks, Orum alternatives: Aloware, JustCall, Kixie, PhoneBurner
Llama 4 MaverickAloware alternatives: Orum
Qwen 3.7 FlashDialer.ai alternatives: Aircall, Kixie, Outreach, Salesloft, Seismic
Kimi K2Aloware alternatives: Aircall, Dialpad, Salesfinity
MiniMax M2.5Aloware alternatives: JustCall, Kixie, Orum

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CloudTalk leads by fourteen points.
CloudTalk28%#1 of 9
Allo14%#4 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
CloudTalk leads by two points.
CloudTalk16%#2 of 12
Allo14%#4 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Allo is not named for this buyer.
CloudTalk4%#8 of 17
Allonot named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CloudTalk

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“CloudTalk struggles with poor connections, dropped calls, UI failing during critical call flows, and low connect rates” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Solid for scaling; higher min cost.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“CloudTalk is a top choice for growth-stage companies because it provides 10-line parallel dialing power without the technical debt” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“CloudTalk is a great all-rounder for growing teams wanting multiple dialing modes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“I would recommend CloudTalk as the best all-around outbound calling platform” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Allo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“these dialers are generally more reliable: - Allo (4.7/5 on G2, single-line progressive, transparent pricing at $45/user)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Allo is the best overall value — a genuine power dialer starting at $32/user/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Allo stands out as one of the best sales dialers (specifically a power/progressive dialer)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.