GTM AI Index
Index Sales Dialers › Allo vs Aircall
Sales dialers and calling · September 2026 Edition

Allo vs Aircall

Zero of twelve models named Allo first on the direct prompt; zero named Aircall. Allo was named by eleven of the twelve models and Aircall by twelve and Allo carries 12 labels and Aircall 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Allo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Aircall

accepted challenger

By Q109016663, Paris, founded 2014. Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share14%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1229A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Allo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Orum was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Aloware vs Allo · Aloware vs Aircall · CloudTalk vs Allo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales dialers and calling page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AlloFirst choices, of twelve modelsAircall
Direct00
Paraphrase03
Comparative001 against Aircall
Budget-constrained601 against Aircall
Scale-constrained00
Negative102 against Aircall
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Allo and Aircall stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Allo Aircall first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Allo on the left and Aircall on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Allo and Aircall stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashDialer.ai alternatives: Aircall, Kixie, Outreach, Salesloft, Seismic
Kimi K2Aloware alternatives: Aircall, Dialpad, Salesfinity

Neither was named

10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aloware Power Dialer, CloudTalk alternatives: Nooks, Orum, PhoneBurner, SmartDialer
GPT-5.4 miniSalesloft alternatives: Klenty, Nooks, Orum, Regie.ai
Gemini 3.5 FlashNooks, Orum alternatives: Aloware, Kixie, PhoneBurner
Perplexity SonarAloware alternatives: CloudTalk, JustCall, Kixie, Nooks, Orum
Grok 4.1 FastAloware, Kixie alternatives: CloudTalk, JustCall, Nooks, Orum
Mistral SmallAloware alternatives: CloudTalk, Nooks, Orum, Skipcall
DeepSeek V4 FlashNooks, Orum alternatives: Aloware, JustCall, Kixie, PhoneBurner
Llama 4 MaverickAloware alternatives: Orum
GLM 4.7 FlashXJustCall alternatives: CloudTalk, Dialpad
MiniMax M2.5Aloware alternatives: JustCall, Kixie, Orum

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Allo leads by eight points.
Allo14%#4 of 9
Aircall6%#5 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Allo leads by seven points.
Allo14%#4 of 12
Aircall7%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Allo is not named for this buyer.
Allonot named
Aircall0%#16 of 17
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Allo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“these dialers are generally more reliable: - Allo (4.7/5 on G2, single-line progressive, transparent pricing at $45/user)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Allo is the best overall value — a genuine power dialer starting at $32/user/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Allo stands out as one of the best sales dialers (specifically a power/progressive dialer)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Aircall

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Biggest concerns: Aggressive auto-renewal, unreliable call logging, and poor outbound dialing features.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Aircall's power dialer needs the $70 Professional plan, not the $30 Essentials plan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Easy setup and strong integrations, but less focused on high-concurrency dialing” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · soft negative
“my default recommendation would be Aircall if you want the best balance of ease of use, CRM integration, and fast rollout” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Aircall ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Aircall: Best for cloud-based outbound calling and suitable for mid-market companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.