Intentsify vs Cognism
One of twelve models named Intentsify first on the direct prompt; zero named Cognism. Intentsify was named by nine of the twelve models and Cognism by eleven and Intentsify carries 19 labels and Cognism 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
By framing
IntentsifyFirst choices, of twelve modelsCognism
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Intentsify Cognism first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Intentsify on the left and Cognism on the right.The direct prompt
Intentsify first, Cognism an alternative
1 of 12 modelsCognism was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Intentsify0%#– of 14Cognism0%#11 of 14Intentsify0%#8 of 9Cognism0%#9 of 9What the models said about Intentsify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“better suited for enterprise ABM teams with dedicated RevOps resources” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Bombora or Intentsify - Recommended for mid-market teams with budgets between $25K-$75K/year for third-party intent data.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Bombora or Intentsify if your primary goal is pure intent data” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“best for mid-market and enterprise teams wanting managed activation services alongside intent intelligence” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about Cognism
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Go with ZoomInfo (US-focused) or Cognism (EMEA-focused) if your SDRs need immediate contact details” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.