Apollo.io vs 6sense
Zero of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; two named 6sense. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and 6sense by fourteen and Apollo.io carries 36 labels and 6sense 64, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-six categories this edition.
Named in twenty-three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen models6sense
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Apollo.io and 6sense were named in the same answer 238 times, of the 1056 answers naming Apollo.io and the 711 naming 6sense. In those answers 6sense took the first choice ten times and Apollo.io ninety-three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Apollo.io 6sense first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and 6sense on the right.The direct prompt
6sense first, Apollo.io an alternative
2 of 14 modelsApollo.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Apollo.io65%#1 of 146sense0%#14 of 14Apollo.io27%#1 of 136sense5%#7 of 136sense44%#1 of 9Apollo.io2%#7 of 9What the models said about Apollo.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Apollo.io - Best All-in-One for Budget Teams ... probably the most accessible entry point for teams that want intent data without enterprise pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about 6sense
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“If you want a single recommendation, 6sense is the strongest default pick for a mid-market B2B company” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.