GTM AI Index
Index GTM data and infrastructure Product analytics › PostHog vs Google Analytics 4
Product analytics · September 2026 Edition

PostHog vs Google Analytics 4

Zero of twelve models named PostHog first on the direct prompt; zero named Google Analytics 4. Both were named by all twelve models and PostHog carries 56 labels and Google Analytics 4 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

PostHog

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Google Analytics 4

criticized challenger

By Google Search, United States, founded 1997. Named in fourteen categories this edition.

First-choice share21%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%61%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels5623A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PostHog reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Amplitude was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Amplitude vs PostHog · Amplitude vs Google Analytics 4 · Mixpanel vs PostHog

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the product analytics page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PostHogFirst choices, of twelve modelsGoogle Analytics 4
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative103 against Google Analytics 4
Budget-constrained913 against Google Analytics 4
Scale-constrained10
Negative202 against PostHog · 8 against Google Analytics 4
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, PostHog and Google Analytics 4 were named in the same answer seventy-nine times, of the 257 answers naming PostHog and the 274 naming Google Analytics 4. In those answers Google Analytics 4 took the first choice seven times and PostHog thirty-four.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where PostHog and Google Analytics 4 stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
PostHog Google Analytics 4 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PostHog on the left and Google Analytics 4 on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PostHog and Google Analytics 4 stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniAmplitude alternatives: Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Gemini 3.5 FlashMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Pendo, PostHog
Perplexity SonarMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
Grok 4.1 FastMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Pendo, PostHog
Mistral SmallAmplitude Analytics alternatives: Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplitude alternatives: Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Kimi K2Amplitude alternatives: Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
GLM 4.7 FlashXMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Heap, June, Pendo
Llama 4 MaverickAmplitude
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplitude, Pendo alternatives: Heap, Mixpanel
MiniMax M2.5Pendo alternatives: Amplitude, Heap

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PostHog leads by forty points.
PostHog43%#1 of 8
Google Analytics 44%#5 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
PostHog leads by nineteen points.
PostHog21%#3 of 8
Google Analytics 42%#6 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
PostHog0%#5 of 9
Google Analytics 40%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about PostHog

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“While tools like PostHog are fantastic, choosing to *self-host* them ... can turn into an engineering resource drain.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Moderate Caution ... Teams prioritizing data ownership → PostHog (self-hosted)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose PostHog if: You have a developer-heavy culture, want to consolidate product analytics, session replays, and feature flags into a single SDK” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you have a technical team and want to get the absolute most value for $0, PostHog is the top choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Google Analytics 4

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Avoid GA4 for EU-based products or if you need product-level insights (it's marketing-focused)” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Thin product analytics: Optimized for marketing/attribution rather than product behavior” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Not ideal for actual product analytics due to data sampling and cardinality thresholding” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“For a tight budget, start with Google Analytics 4 (if web-focused) or Statsig (if you need product analytics beyond web tracking)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.