Zero of twelve models named Looker Studio first on the direct prompt; one named ThoughtSpot. Both were named by all twelve models and Looker Studio carries 23 labels and ThoughtSpot 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Looker, Santa Cruz, founded 2012. Named in four categories this edition.
Palo Alto, United States, founded 2012. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the dashboards and data visualization page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Looker Studio and ThoughtSpot were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 124 answers naming Looker Studio and the 69 naming ThoughtSpot. In those answers ThoughtSpot took the first choice zero times and Looker Studio eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid for complex relational data modeling.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Performance issues with large, heavily-blended datasets ... Frequent connector failures for non-Google platforms” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Free, but has significant limitations: Performance degrades badly beyond ~100MB” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most small businesses starting out, Looker Studio (if Google-connected) or Power BI Desktop → Pro (for Microsoft shops) offer the best balance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Google Looker Studio (formerly Google Data Studio) is the best business intelligence and dashboard tool for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“If your data lives in Google products (GA4, Sheets, BigQuery) → Google Looker Studio - Free, fast setup, no installation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“ThoughtSpot — Starts at $25/user but balloons quickly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Pricing opacity; consumption model can escalate significantly” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“ThoughtSpot - Best for AI-powered business intelligence with GenAI-powered self-serve experience.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose ThoughtSpot if your goal is to empower *everyone* to self-serve without teaching them to code.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“Select ThoughtSpot if: Your leadership team is frustrated because they wait days/weeks for reports” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.