Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 9 → 23 of 92
1 category · Named, not rankedWeld
7Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Weld was named 1 time in Warehouse & ETL, where Hightouch led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 99
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market46 of 83
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise11 of 82
1%2 labels
under the label threshold
In warehouse & etl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Weld for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 46 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 40% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Weld held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Warehouse & ETL · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 45 of 81
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 1% → 1%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
1%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 11 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warehouse & ETL | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 46 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Weld across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Weld across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tools like Weld or Integrate.io bundle ETL *and* reverse ETL in one flat-fee license” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Weld, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Weld was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Weld, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Weld was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Weld. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Weld and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
improvado.io7
integrate.io7
guideflow.com5
hevodata.com5
skyvia.com4
weld.appYour site4
airbyte.com3
toolradar.com3
aboutmartech.com2
cdp.com2
Thirty-eight of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Weld came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
weld.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Weld takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch takes 40%.ShowHide
Search and answers
weld.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Weld takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch takes 40%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing data warehouse and reverse etl stack”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing data warehouse and reverse etl stack”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 165,000 a month (“weld”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 152,391 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 30,335 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,600 · 54 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 684
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 46 of 83 in Warehouse & ETL
Segment leader
40%
Hightouch
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on weld.app
2,962
subdomains included
Content
446
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 2,199
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 194 | 7 | 2026-09-01 | CRM | |
| Template or tool | 103 | 0 | 2024-09-06 | CRM | |
| Report or ebook | 78 | 0 | 2026-04-13 | ||
| Comparison | 63 | 0 | 2026-04-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-02-25 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2025-10-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-01Weld product updates august 2026 blog
- 2026-09-01Weld claude connector directory blog
- 2026-08-26Amazon seller vendor central sql reports blog
- 2026-08-14Zoho crm connector sql reports blog
- 2026-08-01Weld product updates july 2026 blog
- 2026-07-23Shopify sales report sql blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page weld.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Weld
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Weld is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Weld is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Fast, reliable data movement
- For
- data teams
- Price stated
- $79 weld.app
- Starting price
- 79 weld.app
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial • No credit card required weld.app
- Integrations claimed
- 300 weld.app
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type I, II & IIIISO 27001HIPAAGDPR CompliantSOC 2 Type I, IISOC 3SOC 2 Type IIGDPR
- Hosting
- EU hosting options; Frankfurt preferred for EU customers
- Customers named
- eCompleteFlatpayHolaflyDishoomVitaMomentDanish EnduranceFemale Invest
What Weld's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: weld.app, weld.app/pricing, weld.app/security, weld.app/customers, weld.app/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Weld's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Weld, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Weld by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Weld is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Weld, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.