Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 22 of 92
2 categories · RankedStitch
27Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Warehouse & ETL for small business buyers
Rank 56 of 83 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 99
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market56 of 83
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise18 of 82
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In warehouse & etl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Stitch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 56 of 83 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 130 of 159 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Stitch held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Warehouse & ETL · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 81 → 58 of 81
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 50 → 21 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warehouse & ETL | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 81 → 56 of 83 |
| DMP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 130 of 159, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Stitch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Stitch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Stitch and similar lightweight ETL tools if your team does not have data engineering support” Perplexity Sonar · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · soft negative
“Stitch: Simple, but limited connectors.” Mistral Small · Warehouse & ETL · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Stitch, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Stitch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Stitch, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Stitch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Stitch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 27 answers that named Stitch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
improvado.io19
guideflow.com14
portermetrics.com13
airbyte.com12
integrate.io10
supermetrics.com10
cdp.com9
hightouch.com9
leadjourney.io9
skyvia.com9
114 of the 114 domain citations in answers naming Stitch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
stitch.cx is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Stitch takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch takes 40%.ShowHide
Search and answers
stitch.cx is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Stitch takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch takes 40%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing data warehouse and reverse etl stack”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing data warehouse and reverse etl stack”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 823,000 a month (“stitch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 214,976 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 392 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 139 · 19 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 114
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 83 in Warehouse & ETL
Segment leader
40%
Hightouch
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 27 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on stitch.cx
244
subdomains included
Content
134
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 116 | 11 | 2026-09-25 | CDP, CRM | |
| Comparison | 16 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-10-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Whats actually blocking your marketing data teams tools or trust blog
- 2026-09-16Which ai use case should your marketing team start with blog
- 2026-09-16How to diagnose a lifecycle kpi drop using data available in braze blog
- 2026-09-01Stitch earns 2 spot on adweeks fastest growing agency list blog
- 2026-08-272026 braze innovation lookbook blog
- 2026-08-20Racetrac quenches customer thirst with a summer inspired gamified loyalty experience blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page stitch.cx exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Stitch
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Stitch; a claim can dispute any of them.
Stitch (Talend) 1
Follow Stitch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Stitch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Stitch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Stitch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Stitch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Stitch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.