GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Webflow CMS · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Webflow CMS

1Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Webflow CMS was named 1 time in Marketing CMS, where WordPress led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market28 of 62

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In marketing cms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Webflow CMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content management systems for marketing sites	Marketing	0%	28 of 62	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by WordPress at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Webflow CMS yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Webflow CMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Webflow CMS is a top choice for marketing sites in 2026 because it gives you strong design control with structured content collections.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Webflow CMS, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Webflow CMS was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

WordPress1 of 11Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Manager1 of 10Not in the top three

HubSpot Content Hub1 of 10Not in the top three

Shopify1 of 10Not in the top three

Wix1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Webflow CMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Webflow CMS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudways.com1

cybernews.com1

duplex-ventures.com1

guideflow.com1

ingeniux.com1

simpalm.com1

thecmo.com1

wpbeginner.com1

Eight of the eight domain citations in answers naming Webflow CMS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudways.com/blog/best-cms-platforms1

cybernews.com/the-5-best-cms-platforms-for-2026-power-your-digital-presence1

duplex-ventures.com/best-cms-20261

guideflow.com/blog/cms-tools1

ingeniux.com/blog/top-content-management-systems-for-websites-in-20261

simpalm.com/blog/best-content-management-systems1

thecmo.com/tools/best-content-management-software1

wpbeginner.com/showcase/best-cms-platforms-compared1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Webflow is the company behind Webflow CMS.

Website: webflow.com
Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
Founded: 2013

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Webflow CMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Webflow CMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at webflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.