AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Tribble · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Tribble

21Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tribble was named 9 times in RFP response and 1 other category, where Loopio led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In rfp response · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tribble for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
RFP response softwareSales4%8 of 820%8under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%
Value selling toolsSales0%68 of 1160%1under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tribble yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tribble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash11002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tribble is the strongest fit... Tribble is a highly competitive enterprise-grade option for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RFP response · direct prompt · first choice
“Tribble is the strongest first option” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RFP response · direct prompt · first choice
“Best fit for a more enterprise-style business case workflow: Tribble or Mediafly” GPT-5.4 mini · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Smart lower-cost alternative if procurement teams want structured requirement traceability” Muse Glimmer 30B · RFP response · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tribble, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tribble was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Loopio19 of 213Not among the top eight
Responsive16 of 2110Not among the top eight
AutoRFP.ai12 of 211Not among the top eight
Upland Qvidian10 of 211Not among the top eight
Inventive AI9 of 211Not among the top eight
Arphie4 of 210Not among the top eight
GovDash3 of 210Not among the top eight
HeyIris3 of 210Not among the top eight
QorusDocs3 of 210Not among the top eight
DeepRFP2 of 212Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tribble. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Tribble and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

inventive.ai14
learn.g2.com13
responsive.io13
g2.com12
gartner.com9
storyflow.so9
loopio.com8
guideflow.com7
autogenai.com6
autorfp.ai6

Ninety-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Tribble came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

tribble.ai ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Tribble takes 4% of first choices and Loopio takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “rfp response software”
9
Position for “best rfp response software”
8

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 82 in RFP response
Segment leader
25%
Loopio
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on tribble.ai
296
subdomains included
Content
258
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog203482026-08-03CRM, Proposals
Comparison35102026-08-03Proposals, CRM
Glossary or explainer1012026-08-03
Case study642026-09-22
Template or tool412026-08-03

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page tribble.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Tribble

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tribble's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tribble, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tribble by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Tribble is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tribble, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tribble.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.