GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Steerlab · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Steerlab

11Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Steerlab was named 3 times in RFP response, where Loopio led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 68

under the label threshold

Mid-market29 of 82

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 54

under the label threshold

In rfp response · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Steerlab for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
RFP response software	Sales	0%	29 of 82	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Steerlab yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Steerlab across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Lean teams looking for enterprise-grade response quality without the enterprise administrative overhead.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RFP response · direct prompt · alternative

“best for mid-market teams scaling their RFP and questionnaire output” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RFP response · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Steerlab, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Steerlab was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Responsive7 of 113Not among the top eight

Loopio6 of 111Not among the top eight

Breeze Docs4 of 112Not among the top eight

AutoRFP.ai4 of 110Not among the top eight

Upland Qvidian4 of 110Not among the top eight

DeepRFP2 of 112Not among the top eight

Tribble2 of 112Not among the top eight

1up2 of 110Not among the top eight

Inventive AI2 of 110Not among the top eight

SiftHub2 of 110Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Steerlab. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Steerlab and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com8

sifthub.io7

steerlab.aiYour site7

g2.com6

inventive.ai6

responsive.io6

trustradius.com6

autorfp.ai3

loopio.com3

1up.ai2

Forty-seven of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Steerlab came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-rfp-software8

trustradius.com/categories/rfp-response-management6

inventive.ai/blog-posts/best-rfp-software5

g2.com/categories/rfp/small-business4

sifthub.io/blog/tender-management-software4

steerlab.ai/blog/7-best-rfp-software-in-20264

responsive.io/blog/rfp-software-small-businesses3

sifthub.io/blog/rfp-software-for-small-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

steerlab.ai ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Steerlab takes 0% of first choices and Loopio takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rfp response software”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best rfp response software”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 29 of 82 in RFP response

Segment leader

25%

Loopio

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 11 answers
Its own site cited: in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on steerlab.ai

170

subdomains included

Content

154

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Latest
Blog	84	2026-05-18
Glossary or explainer	66	2026-06-19
Comparison	3	2026-05-05
Template or tool	1	2026-04-21

Most recent

2026-06-19What is an rfq glossary or explainer
2026-06-19What is blanket purchase agreement bpa glossary or explainer
2026-05-18Best rfp software media entertainment 2026 blog
2026-05-18Best rfp software pharma life sciences 2026 blog
2026-05-18Best rfp software telecom communications 2026 blog
2026-05-18What is master service agreement msa glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page steerlab.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Steerlab

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Steerlab is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Steerlab is an AI-first solution that automates your responses to RFPs and Security Questionnaires, elevates quality, and delivers insights on how to win.
steerlab.ai
For: PreSales Teams, Proposal Teams, Security Teams
steerlab.ai
Price stated: Free trial available steerlab.ai
Starting price: 0 steerlab.ai
Free plan or trial: Free trial available steerlab.ai
Certifications: SOC2
Hosting: Europe
Customers named: ZendeskAWSMantraGladia
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Steerlab's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: steerlab.ai, steerlab.ai/security, steerlab.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Steerlab's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Steerlab, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Steerlab by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Steerlab is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Steerlab, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.