AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Spotify Advertising · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Spotify Advertising

29Judge labels
7First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Audio advertising for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 101 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In audio advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Spotify Advertising for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Audio and podcast advertisingMarketing2%8 of 10111%9under 10 labels · led by AudioGo at 34%
Native and content advertisingMarketing0%44 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 41%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spotify Advertising yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spotify Advertising across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201113
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels2
Paraphrase8 labels5
Comparative8 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Offers both audio and video ads across its music streaming and podcast inventory, with advanced tools like dynamic ad insertion and targeted audience segmentation. Best for large audiences” Mistral Small · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with Spotify Ad Studio for streaming audio + podcast reach, test creative and audience with the $250 minimum” Muse Glimmer 30B · Audio advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Spotify if you want big reach + self-serve simplicity.” GPT-5.4 mini · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Spotify or iHeart for scale.” Perplexity Sonar · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platform bias toward Spotify-hosted content; limited third-party podcast inventory access; self-serve starts at $250 but managed campaigns require $10K-$15K minimum” Kimi K2 · Audio advertising · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spotify Advertising, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spotify Advertising was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Acast18 of 293Not among the top eight
StackAdapt9 of 292Not among the top eight
iHeartMedia8 of 291Not among the top eight
AdsWizz7 of 291Not among the top eight
AudioGo7 of 291Not among the top eight
The Trade Desk6 of 293Not among the top eight
Triton Digital6 of 292Not among the top eight
Megaphone6 of 290Not among the top eight
SiriusXM Media6 of 290Not among the top eight
Libsyn Ads4 of 291Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spotify Advertising. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 29 answers that named Spotify Advertising and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

influencermarketinghub.com17
acast.com15
heysid.com15
ads.spotify.comYour site12
guideflow.com10
advertiserreview.com8
fame.so8
contentallies.com7
iheartmedia.com7
audiogo.com6

Ninety-three of the 105 domain citations in answers naming Spotify Advertising came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

spotify.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Spotify Advertising takes 2% of first choices and AudioGo takes 34%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “audio advertising platform”
3
Position for “best audio advertising platform”
1
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“spotify advertising”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
66 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 473,414,163 a month
Searches its site ranks for
8,163,454 · 2,764,370 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,645,724
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 8 clicks and $49 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
40+ ads · 29 text, 6 video, 5 image · 40 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2023, as Spotify USA Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 31 before. 80 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 101 in audio advertising
Segment leader
34%
AudioGo
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
29 answers
Its own site cited
in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on spotify.com
3,901
subdomains included
Content
2,758
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press2,307212026-09-25
Podcast or video43262026-09-29
Conference or event912026-09-24
Webinar or virtual event402026-05-21
Case study202026-01-08
Template or tool2undated
Report or ebook1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page spotify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Spotify Advertising

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Spotify Advertising; a claim can dispute any of them.
Spotify Advertising / Spotify Ad Studio 1Spotify Advertising / Spotify Audience Network 1

Follow Spotify Advertising

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spotify Advertising's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spotify Advertising, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spotify Advertising by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Spotify Advertising is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spotify Advertising, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spotify.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.