Every category where a model named SiriusXM Media for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Audio and podcast advertising	Marketing	0%	24 of 101	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by AudioGo at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SiriusXM Media yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SiriusXM Media across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SiriusXM Media is a powerhouse that controls advertising for SiriusXM, Pandora, and a massive slate of exclusive podcasts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · alternative

“Work only with premium programmatic networks (like Triton Digital, SiriusXM Media, or Acast)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audio advertising · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Brands seeking premium, curated audio environments” MiniMax M2.5 · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“I'd want to verify the exact current product lineup before recommending a specific buy path.” GPT-5.4 mini · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SiriusXM Media, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SiriusXM Media was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Acast10 of 222Not among the top eight

AudioGo9 of 222Not among the top eight

Triton Digital8 of 220Not among the top eight

StackAdapt7 of 222Not among the top eight

The Trade Desk7 of 222Not among the top eight

iHeartMedia7 of 220Not among the top eight

Spotify Advertising6 of 223Not among the top eight

Spotify Ads Manager6 of 221Not among the top eight

AdsWizz5 of 220Not among the top eight

Spotify Ad Studio4 of 221Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SiriusXM Media. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named SiriusXM Media and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

acast.com12

influencermarketinghub.com12

ads.spotify.com9

siriusxmmedia.comYour site9

guideflow.com7

heysid.com6

talks.co6

audiogo.com5

geniusmonkey.com5

tritondigital.com5

Sixty-seven of the seventy-six domain citations in answers naming SiriusXM Media came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

influencermarketinghub.com/audio-advertising/audio-ad-platforms12

acast.com/en-gb/news-and-insights/the-best-podcast-advertising-platforms-and-networks-in-27

guideflow.com/blog/audio-advertising-platform7

heysid.com/resources/best-audio-advertising-platforms-for-b2b6

geniusmonkey.com/blog/programmatic-audio-advertising5

influencermarketinghub.com/best-podcast-advertising-platforms5

talks.co/p/podcast-advertising-platforms5

adpushup.com/blog/audio-ad-networks4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

siriusxmmedia.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SiriusXM Media takes 0% of first choices and AudioGo takes 34%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “audio advertising platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best audio advertising platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 210 a month (“siriusxm media”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 16 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 9,551 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,402 · 120 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,546
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

37 ads · 37 text · 19 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as Pandora Media Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 25 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 101 in audio advertising

Segment leader

34%

AudioGo

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on siriusxmmedia.com

2,155

subdomains included

Content

2,133

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Podcast or video	1,340	undated	Video ads
Blog	758	undated	Data clean rooms
Comparison	13	undated
Glossary or explainer	11	undated
Webinar or virtual event	4	undated
Conference or event	3	undated
News or press	2	undated
Case study	1	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page siriusxmmedia.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as SiriusXM Media

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SiriusXM Media; a claim can dispute any of them.

SiriusXM Media / Podcast Network 1

Follow SiriusXM Media

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SiriusXM Media's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SiriusXM Media, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SiriusXM Media by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SiriusXM Media is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SiriusXM Media, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.