1 category · RankediHeartMedia
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audio and podcast advertising | Marketing | 0% | 19 of 101 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by AudioGo at 34% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated iHeartMedia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Spotify or iHeart for scale.” Perplexity Sonar · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best For: Cross-platform media buys (combining traditional broadcast radio with digital audio/podcasts).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · alternative
“iHeart is the better choice if you're buying podcast and broadcast radio together.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Audio advertising · comparative prompt · alternative
“iHeartMedia | Massive US reach, local targeting | Regional brands” Grok 4.1 Fast · Audio advertising · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iHeartMedia, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iHeartMedia was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 28 answers that named iHeartMedia and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
104 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming iHeartMedia came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
iheartmedia.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, iHeartMedia takes 0% of first choices and AudioGo takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 22,200 a month (“iheartmedia”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 937 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 691,586 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 28,447 · 3,183 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,667
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 28 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 27 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 24 | undated | |||
| Blog | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page iheartmedia.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow iHeartMedia
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iHeartMedia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iHeartMedia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iHeartMedia by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where iHeartMedia is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name iHeartMedia, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.