GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › SocialBook · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SocialBook

11Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SocialBook was named 5 times in Influencer, where Favikon led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business27 of 80

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 79

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SocialBook for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	0%	25 of 79	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Favikon at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SocialBook yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SocialBook across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Have $0 budget and need full campaigns | Ainfluencer, InfluenceFlow, or SocialBook” Kimi K2 · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

“Consider SocialBook if you prefer creators to apply to your campaigns” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

“4. SocialBook ⭐ Best for Inbound Campaigns” Mistral Small · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SocialBook, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialBook was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Afluencer11 of 114Not in the top three

HypeAuditor11 of 110Not in the top three

Shopify Collabs10 of 110Not in the top three

Tracknow7 of 110Not in the top three

Elev8or6 of 113Not in the top three

Influencity6 of 110Not in the top three

Collabstr4 of 111Not in the top three

InfluenceFlow4 of 111Not in the top three

Sprout Social Influencer Marketing4 of 110Not in the top three

Ainfluencer3 of 112Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SocialBook. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 11 answers that named SocialBook and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amourvert.com2

elev8or.io2

learn.g2.com2

afluencer.com1

archive.com1

blog.hypeauditor.com1

breezy.io1

customers.ai1

flinque.com1

g2.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming SocialBook came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amourvert.com/articles/best-influencer-marketing-platforms-for-small-businesses-and-startu2

elev8or.io/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platform-for-small-business2

learn.g2.com/free-influencer-marketing-platforms2

afluencer.com/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platforms1

archive.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms-small-business1

blog.hypeauditor.com/influencer-marketing-platforms-for-small-businesses-running-on-tight-1

breezy.io/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platforms1

customers.ai/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platform-for-small-business1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SocialBook's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SocialBook, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socialbook.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.