GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Social Snowball · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Social Snowball

6Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Social Snowball was named 4 times in Affiliate and 1 other category, where PartnerStack led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business37 of 109

under the label threshold

Mid-market51 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Social Snowball for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	0%	51 of 87	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%
Loyalty, advocacy and referrals	Marketing	0%	103 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Social Snowball yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Social Snowball across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For influencer/creator programs: Modash or Social Snowball” MiniMax M2.5 · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some platforms (like Social Snowball or Refersion's basic plans) look cheap upfront but charge a 2% to 3% transaction fee” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Social Snowball, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Social Snowball was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Refersion4 of 60Not in the top three

Rewardful4 of 60Not in the top three

impact.com4 of 60Not in the top three

FirstPromoter3 of 61Not in the top three

Awin3 of 60Not in the top three

CJ Affiliate3 of 60Not in the top three

ClickBank3 of 60Not in the top three

PartnerStack3 of 60Not in the top three

Rakuten Advertising3 of 60Not in the top three

UpPromote3 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Social Snowball. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 6 answers that named Social Snowball and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bloggingwizard.com1

ddiy.co1

digitalvidya.com1

elementor.com1

flowlu.com1

gartner.com1

influencermarketinghub.com1

joinbrands.com1

levanta.io1

linkjolt.io1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Social Snowball came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bloggingwizard.com/affiliate-platforms-and-networks1

ddiy.co/affiliate-marketplaces1

digitalvidya.com/blog/affiliate-marketing-websites1

elementor.com/blog/top-affiliate-networks1

flowlu.com/blog/finances/best-affiliate-programs1

gartner.com/reviews/market/affiliate-marketing-platforms1

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-software-platforms1

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-websites1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Social Snowball's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Social Snowball, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socialsnowball.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.