GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Skrapp · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Skrapp

21Judge labels

4First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Skrapp was named 6 times in Email verification and 2 other categories, where ZeroBounce led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 48

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 53

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 48

under the label threshold

In email verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skrapp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Email verification	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	11 of 53	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 29%
Influencer platforms	Marketing	0%	27 of 79	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Favikon at 27%
Sales intelligence and contact data	Sales	0%	27 of 44	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 76%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skrapp yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skrapp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	3	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels3

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best all-around pick for B2B outbound teams... I'd recommend evaluating Skrapp or Bouncer first” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email verification · direct prompt · first choice

“Skrapp leads for B2B sales teams, combining lead generation and verification into one platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email verification · comparative prompt · alternative

“Favikon for discovery and Skrapp for email outreach are cost-effective starting points” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Influencer · direct prompt · alternative

“Skrapp for email outreach, which are cost-effective starting points” Llama 4 Maverick · Influencer · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skrapp, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skrapp was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Favikon8 of 215Not in the top three

Apollo.io7 of 214Not in the top three

ZoomInfo7 of 211Not in the top three

Hunter6 of 211Not in the top three

Lusha6 of 211Not in the top three

ZeroBounce5 of 211Not in the top three

NeverBounce4 of 210Not in the top three

Traackr4 of 210Not in the top three

Clearout3 of 211Not in the top three

Modash3 of 211Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skrapp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 21 answers that named Skrapp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

skrapp.ioYour site10

pipeline.zoominfo.com6

overloop.com3

resources.listmint.io3

allegrow.co2

apollo.io2

archive.com2

brightdata.com2

bringseo.com2

demandbase.com2

Twenty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Skrapp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

skrapp.io/blog/best-email-verifier5

pipeline.zoominfo.com/marketing/email-verification-tools4

pipeline.zoominfo.com/operations/email-finder-verification-tools4

resources.listmint.io/blog/best-email-verification-tools3

skrapp.io/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms3

allegrow.co/knowledge-base/best-email-verifier-tools-softwares-for-b2b2

apollo.io/insights/which-tool-offers-the-best-email-verification2

archive.com/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platforms-b2b2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skrapp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skrapp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skrapp.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.