Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 88 → 30 of 92
1 category · Named, not rankedSimilarweb AI Search Intelligence
11Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Similarweb AI Search Intelligence was named 2 times in AI visibility, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business31 of 94
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market35 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 79
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Similarweb AI Search Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 0% | 35 of 90 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Similarweb AI Search Intelligence held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI visibility · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 89 → 34 of 85
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 of 74, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 89 → 35 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Similarweb AI Search Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Similarweb AI Search Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Semrush / Similarweb / BrightEdge / Conductor-type platforms can be better” GPT-5.4 mini · AI visibility · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Similarweb AI Search Intelligence if your primary goal is proving ROI” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI visibility · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Similarweb AI Search Intelligence, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Similarweb AI Search Intelligence was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Similarweb AI Search Intelligence, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Similarweb AI Search Intelligence was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Similarweb AI Search Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Similarweb AI Search Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
usa.inquirer.net8
tryprofound.com6
semrush.com5
g2.com4
zapier.com4
airops.com3
blog.hubspot.com3
dageno.ai3
geoptie.com3
integrate.io3
Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Similarweb AI Search Intelligence came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
similarweb.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Similarweb AI Search Intelligence takes 0% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
similarweb.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Similarweb AI Search Intelligence takes 0% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,862,043 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 62,966 · 5,409 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 49,447
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 35 of 90 in AI visibility
Segment leader
20%
Otterly
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on similarweb.com
10,879
subdomains included
Content
3,265
counted in the table below
Documentation
244
Product · Integration
76 · 131
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,551 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | SEO, ABM | |
| Report or ebook | 992 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | SEO | |
| News or press | 382 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | SEO | |
| Conference or event | 106 | 1 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Comparison | 90 | 0 | 2026-02-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 87 | undated | SEO | ||
| Case study | 31 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 0 | 2024-08-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2022-06-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Anthropic ipo report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Geo blog
- 2026-09-24Press releases news or press
- 2026-09-22Summer of search report report or ebook
- 2026-09-06State of ecommerce 2026 report or ebook
- 2026-08-1220260812 second quarter 2026 financial results conference call conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page similarweb.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (105); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Similarweb AI Search Intelligence
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Similarweb AI Search Intelligence; a claim can dispute any of them.
Similarweb 1
Follow Similarweb AI Search Intelligence
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Similarweb AI Search Intelligence is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Similarweb AI Search Intelligence is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Track and grow your brand's visibility across AI search engines and chatbots
- For
- marketers
- Price stated
- Yes, all Similarweb integrations are free for customers with API access. similarweb.com/corp/daas/integrations
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial similarweb.com
- Integrations claimed
- 10 similarweb.com/corp/daas/integrations
- Customers named
- DHLAdyenHootsuiteUPSRakuten AdvertisingSimplrCJ AffiliateKelkoo Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications, hosting
What Similarweb AI Search Intelligence's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: similarweb.com, similarweb.com/corp/search/features/search-ads, similarweb.com/corp/ja/customers, similarweb.com/corp/daas/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Similarweb AI Search Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Similarweb AI Search Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Similarweb AI Search Intelligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Similarweb AI Search Intelligence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Similarweb AI Search Intelligence, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.