GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Sensor Tower · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Sensor Tower

12Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sensor Tower was named 6 times in Mobile apps, where Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business138 of 139

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 136

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In mobile apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sensor Tower for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	21 of 136	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sensor Tower yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sensor Tower across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Large enterprises needing competitive intelligence” Mistral Small · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“The undisputed giant of competitive intelligence.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“Sensor Tower: Best for market intelligence” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“Sensor Tower at enterprise” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sensor Tower, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sensor Tower was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneSignal11 of 123Not in the top three

AppTweak11 of 120Not in the top three

AppsFlyer10 of 124Not in the top three

Adjust10 of 121Not in the top three

Braze10 of 121Not in the top three

CleverTap9 of 120Not in the top three

Branch8 of 120Not in the top three

App Radar6 of 123Not in the top three

Appfigures6 of 121Not in the top three

Singular6 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as Sensor Tower

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sensor Tower; a claim can dispute any of them.

SensorTower 1

The company

Sensor Tower.

Website: sensortower.com
Headquarters: United States
Founded: 2013

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sensor Tower's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sensor Tower, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sensortower.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.