Every category where a model named MobileAction for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
App store optimization tools	Marketing	5%	6 of 56	6%	32	accepted challenger
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	36 of 117	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MobileAction yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MobileAction across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	6	0	1	7
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.20	0	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	1	2	1	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	2	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	3	0	0	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels1

Paraphrase13 labels1

Comparative27 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels3

Scale-constrained12 labelsNone

Negative13 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“This is a great starting point for small teams or startups that need basic ASO insights without a financial commitment.” Mistral Small · App store optimization · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd start with MobileAction Pro for a mid-sized B2B company focused on app-store rankings.” GPT-6 Luna · App store optimization · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“shortlist AppTweak or MobileAction for hands-on ASO” GPT-6 Luna · App store optimization · comparative prompt · first choice

“For a tight budget, I'd start with MobileAction Lite.” GPT-6 Luna · App store optimization · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“high-tier Sensor Tower or MobileAction are incredible resources for massive marketing teams. However, they often lock their most useful keyword tools behind expensive enterprise-level subscriptions” Gemini 3.5 Flash · App store optimization · negative prompt · soft negative

“More agency-oriented; strong ASA automation but less B2B-specific brand/competitor intelligence.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MobileAction, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MobileAction was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

AppTweak72 of 9527Compare →

Sensor Tower66 of 9513Compare →

AppFollow50 of 956Compare →

App Radar48 of 958Compare →

Appfigures36 of 958Compare →

data.ai15 of 952Not among the top eight

SplitMetrics Optimize15 of 950Not among the top eight

ASOdesk14 of 950Not among the top eight

OneSignal8 of 955Not among the top eight

Adjust8 of 951Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MobileAction. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 91 of the 95 answers that named MobileAction and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appfollow.io56

appradar.com46

g2.com40

appdrift.co38

apptweak.com36

webseotrends.com33

theapplaunchpad.com28

trysonar.app27

guideflow.com26

strataigize.com26

356 of the 356 domain citations in answers naming MobileAction came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appfollow.io/blog/aso-tools48

appradar.com/academy/aso-tools40

appdrift.co/blog/15-best-app-store-optimization-tools35

webseotrends.com/blog/best-aso-tools33

asomobile.net/en/blog/best-aso-tools-2026-platform-comparison-pricing-and-features21

trysonar.app/blog/best-aso-tools19

guideflow.com/blog/best-aso-tools18

seowebster.com/blog/app-store-optimization-tools-for-saas-companies18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mobileaction.co ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, MobileAction takes 5% of first choices and AppTweak takes 39%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “app store optimization tool”

Position for “best app store optimization tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“mobileaction”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 11 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 73,767 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,528 · 72 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,513
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 56 in app store optimization

Segment leader

39%

AppTweak

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 95 answers
Its own site cited: in 91 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mobileaction.co

1,105

subdomains included

Content

1,000

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	474	6	2026-09-04	SEO, Mobile apps
Glossary or explainer	270	0	2025-12-11
Report or ebook	132	0	2026-06-22
Case study	60	0	2023-10-25
Webinar or virtual event	50	0	2021-11-30
Comparison	12	0	2025-11-16	SEO
Template or tool	1	0	2024-12-27
Podcast or video	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-04Consistent creative journey app store blog
2026-08-18New creative assets are coming to the app store blog
2026-08-18New era in search results ads blog
2026-08-14Mobileaction mcp server blog
2026-08-10Holiday season app strategy blog
2026-07-05Apple ads crypto volatility automation blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mobileaction.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as MobileAction

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MobileAction; a claim can dispute any of them.

MobileAction (Free Plan) 1MobileAction Lite 1MobileAction Pro 1Mobileaction 1

Follow MobileAction

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

MobileAction is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Growth partner of apps and games
mobileaction.co
For: ASO, UA & App Growth
mobileaction.co
Price stated: Lite $15 per month billed monthly; $12.5 per month billed yearly. Basic $69 per month billed monthly; $59 per month billed yearly. Pro $239 per month billed monthly; $199 per month billed yearly. Enterprise Contact us. Free $0. Enterprise Contact us. Search Ads Intelligence Contact us. CPP Intelligence Contact us. API Solutions Custom plan for your needs. ASO Services Contact us. Apple Ads Services Contact us. mobileaction.co/pricing
Starting price: 0 mobileaction.co/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start Free 7-Day Trial; Free plan $0; limited-time trial for the Enterprise plan; 7-day trial for ASO Basic and ASO Pro plans; 3-day trial for the Market Intelligence Pro plan mobileaction.co/pricing
Integrations claimed: 8 mobileaction.co/pricing
Certifications: SOC2 CertifiedGDPR CompliantApple Ads PartnerSOC 2 Type IIGDPRMicrosoft Supplier Security & Privacy Assurance ProgramApple Ads Certification
Hosting: USA
Customers named: SquareM&C Saatchi PerformanceBigo LiveWavve Boating

What MobileAction's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mobileaction.co, mobileaction.co/pricing, trust.mobileaction.co, mobileaction.co/solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MobileAction's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MobileAction, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MobileAction by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where MobileAction is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name MobileAction, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.