Every category where a model named SplitMetrics Optimize for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
App store optimization tools	Marketing	0%	19 of 56	0%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SplitMetrics Optimize yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SplitMetrics Optimize across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SplitMetrics tends to skew more toward Apple Ads optimization and can be expensive at the higher end” GPT-5.4 mini · App store optimization · direct prompt · alternative

“SplitMetrics stands out for experiment workflows that connect listing changes to measurable results.” Perplexity Sonar · App store optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

“TheTool, Storemaven, and SplitMetrics excel in performance tracking and conversion optimization” Mistral Small · App store optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose SplitMetrics/App Radar if you're new to ASO or need A/B testing capabilities” Kimi K2 · App store optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SplitMetrics Optimize, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SplitMetrics Optimize was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

AppTweak26 of 2812Not among the top eight

Sensor Tower26 of 2810Not among the top eight

AppFollow23 of 281Not among the top eight

App Radar17 of 282Not among the top eight

MobileAction15 of 280Not among the top eight

Appfigures10 of 281Not among the top eight

data.ai7 of 281Not among the top eight

ASOdesk5 of 280Not among the top eight

Gummicube4 of 280Not among the top eight

StoreMaven4 of 280Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SplitMetrics Optimize. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 28 answers that named SplitMetrics Optimize and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appfollow.io17

theapplaunchpad.com15

appradar.com14

appdrift.co12

webseotrends.com12

apptweak.com11

trysonar.app10

asomobile.net8

businessofapps.com8

guideflow.com8

115 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming SplitMetrics Optimize came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appfollow.io/blog/aso-tools14

webseotrends.com/blog/best-aso-tools12

appradar.com/academy/aso-tools11

appdrift.co/blog/15-best-app-store-optimization-tools10

theapplaunchpad.com/blog/best-app-store-optimization-tool10

trysonar.app/blog/best-aso-tools10

asomobile.net/en/blog/best-aso-tools-2026-platform-comparison-pricing-and-features8

guideflow.com/blog/best-aso-tools8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

splitmetrics.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SplitMetrics Optimize takes 0% of first choices and AppTweak takes 39%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “app store optimization tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best app store optimization tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“splitmetrics optimize”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 22,362 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,016 · 142 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,223
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

32 ads · 27 image, 5 text · 19 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as SplitMetrics, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 5 in the year, 27 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 19 of 56 in app store optimization

Segment leader

39%

AppTweak

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 28 answers
Its own site cited: in 27 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on splitmetrics.com

916

subdomains included

Content

592

counted in the table below

Documentation

231

Product · Integration

3 · 8

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	325	9	2026-09-18	Mobile apps
Glossary or explainer	172	0	2021-12-13
Case study	77	1	2026-08-05
Comparison	8	0	2026-06-08
Template or tool	4	0	2025-10-14
Webinar or virtual event	3	undated
Conference or event	1	undated
Report or ebook	1	undated
Podcast or video	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-18Introducing switch method for cpp experiments blog
2026-09-18App store creative assets blog
2026-09-16Paid ua channels mobile apps blog
2026-09-11Apple ads automation for external market signals blog
2026-09-03Apple ads optimization blog
2026-08-13Apple ads roas blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page splitmetrics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SplitMetrics Optimize

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SplitMetrics Optimize; a claim can dispute any of them.

SplitMetrics 9App Radar/SplitMetrics 1SplitMetrics / App Radar 1

Follow SplitMetrics Optimize

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SplitMetrics Optimize's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SplitMetrics Optimize, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SplitMetrics Optimize by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SplitMetrics Optimize is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SplitMetrics Optimize, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.