Every category where a model named Appfigures for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
App store optimization tools	Marketing	9%	2 of 56	7%	28	accepted challenger
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	38 of 117	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Appfigures yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Appfigures across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	2	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	0	2
Grok 4.20	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels4

Paraphrase8 labels7

Comparative30 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels9

Scale-constrained8 labels2

Negative13 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative93 labels in all, every segment counted; 22 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My top pick for a limited budget: Appfigures – At just $9.99/month, it gives you a professional-grade tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · budget prompt · first choice

“Stick with well-reviewed, mature ASO platforms like AppTweak, AppFollow, or Appfigures” Mistral Small · App store optimization · negative prompt · first choice

“or Appfigures if you can spend a little and want stronger analytics in one place” Perplexity Sonar · App store optimization · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend evaluating Appfigures or AppTweak as starting points” Claude Haiku 4.5 · App store optimization · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Almost all major ASO tools (e.g., AppTweak, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, AppFigures, Astro) offer proprietary metrics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · App store optimization · negative prompt · soft negative

“Not robust enough for serious ASO strategy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Appfigures, over the 93 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Appfigures was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

AppTweak67 of 9315Compare →

App Radar60 of 936Compare →

AppFollow58 of 936Compare →

Sensor Tower57 of 939Compare →

MobileAction36 of 932Compare →

Sonar23 of 932Compare →

ASOMobile19 of 935Compare →

data.ai16 of 931Not among the top eight

ASOdesk15 of 930Not among the top eight

ASOTools14 of 934Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Appfigures. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 93 answers that named Appfigures and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appfollow.io64

appradar.com53

webseotrends.com50

g2.com47

trysonar.app47

theapplaunchpad.com45

appdrift.co36

asomobile.net35

guideflow.com32

apptweak.com27

436 of the 436 domain citations in answers naming Appfigures came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appfollow.io/blog/aso-tools56

webseotrends.com/blog/best-aso-tools50

appradar.com/academy/aso-tools48

trysonar.app/blog/best-aso-tools39

theapplaunchpad.com/blog/best-app-store-optimization-tool36

appdrift.co/blog/15-best-app-store-optimization-tools35

asomobile.net/en/blog/best-aso-tools-2026-platform-comparison-pricing-and-features29

guideflow.com/blog/best-aso-tools26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

appfigures.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Appfigures takes 9% of first choices and AppTweak takes 39%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “app store optimization tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best app store optimization tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“appfigures”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 15 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 54,328 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 9,485 · 509 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 9,667
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 2 of 56 in app store optimization

Segment leader

39%

AppTweak

First choices: 22 across its categories
Named in: 93 answers
Its own site cited: in 93 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on appfigures.com

297

subdomains included

Content

171

counted in the table below

Documentation

111

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	154	2	2026-09-29
Report or ebook	8	undated
Glossary or explainer	5	undated
Blog	3	undated
Comparison	1	0	2017-01-30

Most recent

2026-09-29Introducing appfigures mcp 347245 news or press
2026-08-11Introducing the appfigures cli 343932 news or press
2026-06-30Introducing appfigures leaderboards 340917 news or press
2026-04-23App intelligence for ipad 334667 news or press
2025-12-01Support for by state financial reports via the api 327724 news or press
2025-11-25Daily averages across reports 327444 news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page appfigures.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Appfigures

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Appfigures; a claim can dispute any of them.

AppFigures 4

Follow Appfigures

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Appfigures is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Track app downloads and revenue, research competitors, find better keywords, and monitor market trends with one platform built for mobile app growth.
appfigures.com
For: App Developers, Game Developers, Market Analysts, Enterprise, SDK Makers, Journalists, Growth Marketers, Indie Developers, Academic Researchers
appfigures.com
Free plan or trial: Get Started Free appfigures.com
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Appfigures's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: appfigures.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Appfigures's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Appfigures, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Appfigures by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Appfigures is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Appfigures, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Appfigures is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Appfigures is among the products AI models recommend first in App store optimization tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/app-store-optimization/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/appfigures--app-store-optimization-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in App store optimization tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the App store optimization tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/app-store-optimization/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/appfigures--app-store-optimization-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in App store optimization tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the App store optimization tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/app-store-optimization/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/appfigures--app-store-optimization-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in App store optimization tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the App store optimization tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.