AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › App store optimization › Appfigures vs AppFollow
App store optimization tools · October 2026 Edition

Appfigures vs AppFollow

One of fourteen models named Appfigures first on the direct prompt; zero named AppFollow. Appfigures was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and AppFollow by fourteen and Appfigures carries 28 labels and AppFollow 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Appfigures

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

AppFollow

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share9%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%2%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels2847A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Appfigures reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.AppTweak was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. AppTweak vs Appfigures · AppTweak vs AppFollow · Appfigures vs App Radar

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the app store optimization tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AppfiguresFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAppFollow
Direct101 against Appfigures
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained42
Scale-constrained00
Negative121 against Appfigures · 1 against AppFollow
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Appfigures and AppFollow were named in the same answer fifty-eight times, of the 93 answers naming Appfigures and the 136 naming AppFollow. In those answers AppFollow took the first choice six times and Appfigures fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Appfigures and AppFollow stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Appfigures AppFollow first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Appfigures on the left and AppFollow on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Appfigures and AppFollow stood in it.

Appfigures first, AppFollow an alternative

1 of 14 modelsAppFollow was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5AppTweak, Appfigures alternatives: AppFollow, Lengreo, Sensor Tower

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, AppFollow, MobileAction
Grok 4.1 FastAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, AppFollow, Mobile Action
Mistral SmallGuideflow alternatives: AppFollow, Applytics, MobileAction
Llama 4 MaverickApplytics alternatives: AppFollow, AppTweak, Guideflow
Qwen 3.7 FlashApp Radar, AppTweak alternatives: AppFollow
Kimi K2AppTweak alternatives: AppFollow, MobileAction
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, AppFollow, Appfigures
MiniMax M2.5App Radar, AppTweak alternatives: ASO.dev, AppFollow, MobileAction

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, MobileAction, SplitMetrics Optimize
Perplexity SonarAppTweak alternatives: MobileAction
DeepSeek V4 FlashAppTweak alternatives: App Follow, MobileAction
GPT-6 LunaMobileAction ASO Intelligence Pro alternatives: AppTweak Grow
Muse Glimmer 30BAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, Applytics

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Appfigures leads by sixteen points.
Appfigures27%#1 of 11
AppFollow11%#3 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Appfigures leads by two points.
Appfigures9%#2 of 9
AppFollow7%#3 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: AppFollow leads at enterprise.
AppFollow15%#3 of 8
Appfigures2%#5 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Appfigures

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Almost all major ASO tools (e.g., AppTweak, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, AppFigures, Astro) offer proprietary metrics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not robust enough for serious ASO strategy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“My top pick for a limited budget: Appfigures – At just $9.99/month, it gives you a professional-grade tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Stick with well-reviewed, mature ASO platforms like AppTweak, AppFollow, or Appfigures” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“or Appfigures if you can spend a little and want stronger analytics in one place” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about AppFollow

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“AppFollow (Proceed with Caution)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“AppFollow: It is a comprehensive ASO platform that offers keyword research, competitor tracking, and market intelligence.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend AppFollow as the best fit if your main goal is mobile app rankings / ASO” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the strongest overall pick is AppFollow's free tier if you need the broadest no-cost coverage” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.