AppFollow vs ASOMobile
Zero of fourteen models named AppFollow first on the direct prompt; zero named ASOMobile. AppFollow was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ASOMobile by nine and AppFollow carries 47 labels and ASOMobile 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the app store optimization tools page.
By framing
AppFollowFirst choices, of fourteen modelsASOMobile
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, AppFollow and ASOMobile were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 136 answers naming AppFollow and the 30 naming ASOMobile. In those answers ASOMobile took the first choice five times and AppFollow five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
AppFollow ASOMobile first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AppFollow on the left and ASOMobile on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
AppFollow11%#3 of 11ASOMobile7%#6 of 11AppFollow15%#3 of 8ASOMobile0%#– of 8What the models said about AppFollow
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“AppFollow (Proceed with Caution)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“AppFollow: It is a comprehensive ASO platform that offers keyword research, competitor tracking, and market intelligence.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend AppFollow as the best fit if your main goal is mobile app rankings / ASO” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the strongest overall pick is AppFollow's free tier if you need the broadest no-cost coverage” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about ASOMobile
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“solid but start paid and lack fully free equivalents matching AppFollow's breadth” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best app store optimization tool for a company with a limited budget is ASOMobile” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best All-Around Budget Pick: ASOMobile” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“ASOMobile - Best Overall Value” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.