One of fourteen models named Appfigures first on the direct prompt; zero named Sensor Tower. Appfigures was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Sensor Tower by fourteen and Appfigures carries 28 labels and Sensor Tower 48, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
United States, founded 2013. Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the app store optimization tools page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Appfigures and Sensor Tower were named in the same answer fifty-seven times, of the 93 answers naming Appfigures and the 176 naming Sensor Tower. In those answers Sensor Tower took the first choice nine times and Appfigures eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Almost all major ASO tools (e.g., AppTweak, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, AppFigures, Astro) offer proprietary metrics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not robust enough for serious ASO strategy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“My top pick for a limited budget: Appfigures – At just $9.99/month, it gives you a professional-grade tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Stick with well-reviewed, mature ASO platforms like AppTweak, AppFollow, or Appfigures” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“or Appfigures if you can spend a little and want stronger analytics in one place” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise pricing (custom, typically $25K+/year), overkill for mid-market needs” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Overkill and overpriced for a mid-sized B2B company focused on ASO execution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“high-tier Sensor Tower or MobileAction are incredible resources for massive marketing teams. However, they often lock their most useful keyword tools behind expensive enterprise-level subscriptions” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Leads in keyword research with the most comprehensive keyword database, real-time difficulty scores, and search volume estimates.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Prioritize tools like Sensor Tower, data.ai (App Annie), AppTweak, or App Radar, which often suit enterprises with custom pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“The dominant player in mobile market intelligence... depth of market intelligence (Sensor Tower is the clear leader)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.