Every category where a model named ASOTools for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
App store optimization tools	Marketing	2%	9 of 56	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by AppTweak at 39%
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	52 of 117	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ASOTools yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ASOTools across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase2 labels2

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels4

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for keyword research and competitive ASO insights on a budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · App store optimization · budget prompt · first choice

“ASOTools is best for keyword research and competitive ASO insights on a budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · App store optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

“Add ASOTools – Use the free tier for keyword research and competitor analysis” GLM 4.7 FlashX · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative

“Extremely affordable starting price... Limited advanced features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ASOTools (Chrome Extension) – Avoid” GLM 4.7 FlashX · App store optimization · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ASOTools, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ASOTools was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

App Radar16 of 223Not among the top eight

Appfigures14 of 224Not among the top eight

AppTweak13 of 224Not among the top eight

AppFollow12 of 221Not among the top eight

Sensor Tower11 of 221Not among the top eight

ASOMobile6 of 221Not among the top eight

Sonar6 of 220Not among the top eight

MobileAction5 of 220Not among the top eight

ASOdesk4 of 220Not among the top eight

AppDrift4 of 220Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ASOTools. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named ASOTools and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appfollow.io17

webseotrends.com14

appdrift.co13

g2.com12

trysonar.app12

guideflow.com11

appradar.com10

asomobile.net10

businessofapps.com10

theapplaunchpad.com9

No domain is on file for ASOTools, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

appfollow.io/blog/aso-tools14

webseotrends.com/blog/best-aso-tools14

appdrift.co/blog/15-best-app-store-optimization-tools13

businessofapps.com/marketplace/app-store-optimization/aso-tools10

guideflow.com/blog/best-aso-tools10

appradar.com/academy/aso-tools9

asomobile.net/en/blog/best-aso-tools-2026-platform-comparison-pricing-and-features9

trysonar.app/blog/best-aso-tools8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where ASOTools stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“asotools”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 56 in app store optimization

Segment leader

39%

AppTweak

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as ASOTools

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ASOTools; a claim can dispute any of them.

ASOTools (Chrome Extension) 1

Follow ASOTools

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ASOTools's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ASOTools, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ASOTools by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ASOTools is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ASOTools, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.