AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › AppDrift · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

AppDrift

14Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AppDrift was named 5 times in App store optimization, where AppTweak led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In app store optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AppDrift for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
App store optimization toolsMarketing0%24 of 5620%5under 10 labels · led by AppTweak at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AppDrift yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AppDrift across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AppDrift (Free and paid plans from $9.99/month) brings research, drafts, translation and supported store updates together.” Muse Glimmer 30B · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“AppDrift is a good option for indie and small teams, offering free and paid plans starting at $9.99/month” Llama 4 Maverick · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“AppDrift Free covers one app and five tracked keywords without a card” Claude Haiku 4.5 · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“$9.99/month for 5 apps, 50 tracked keywords” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Too limited in keyword capacity and competitor tracking depth.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AppDrift, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppDrift was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
App Radar11 of 141Not among the top eight
Appfigures10 of 146Not among the top eight
AppTweak9 of 142Not among the top eight
AppFollow6 of 141Not among the top eight
Sensor Tower6 of 140Not among the top eight
Sonar6 of 140Not among the top eight
ASOTools4 of 141Not among the top eight
Applyra4 of 140Not among the top eight
MobileAction4 of 140Not among the top eight
ASOMobile3 of 141Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AppDrift. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named AppDrift and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appdrift.coYour site14
appfollow.io9
trysonar.app9
appradar.com8
webseotrends.com8
apptweak.com5
asomobile.net5
g2.com5
guideflow.com5
applyra.io4

Fifty-eight of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming AppDrift came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on appdrift.co
374
subdomains included
Content
182
counted in the table below
Documentation
12
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog82202026-09-10
Template or tool4002026-05-02
Comparison3852026-09-10SEO
Report or ebook18undated
Glossary or explainer302026-04-11
News or press1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page appdrift.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow AppDrift

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppDrift's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppDrift, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AppDrift by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AppDrift is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AppDrift, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at appdrift.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.