| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| App store optimization tools | Marketing | 0% | 24 of 56 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by AppTweak at 39% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AppDrift (Free and paid plans from $9.99/month) brings research, drafts, translation and supported store updates together.” Muse Glimmer 30B · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“AppDrift is a good option for indie and small teams, offering free and paid plans starting at $9.99/month” Llama 4 Maverick · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“AppDrift Free covers one app and five tracked keywords without a card” Claude Haiku 4.5 · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“$9.99/month for 5 apps, 50 tracked keywords” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Too limited in keyword capacity and competitor tracking depth.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · App store optimization · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named AppDrift and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-eight of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming AppDrift came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 82 | 20 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 40 | 0 | 2026-05-02 | ||
| Comparison | 38 | 5 | 2026-09-10 | SEO | |
| Report or ebook | 18 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-11 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page appdrift.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppDrift's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppDrift, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AppDrift by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: