Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 81 of 87, unchanged
SAP
27Judge labels
0First choices
18Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP was named 9 times in CRM data quality and 6 other categories, where Insycle led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business92 of 96
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market90 of 99
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise57 of 103
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 0% | 90 of 99 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 124 of 142 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 116 of 124 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 151 of 159 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 92 of 115 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 90 of 94 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 100 of 110 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CRM data quality · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 76 → 84 of 90
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 54 of 93, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM data quality | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 76 → 90 of 99 |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 124 of 142, unchanged |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 116 of 124, unchanged |
| DMP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 151 of 159, unchanged |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 92 of 115, unchanged |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 90 of 94, unchanged |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 100 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid treating these as full-fledged marketing engines; they are usually administrative filing cabinets.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Channel marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms (like Adobe or SAP)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DMP · direct prompt · hard negative
“aren't quite ready for the massive overhead of an enterprise-grade monolith like Oracle or SAP without significant customization” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer intel · scale prompt · soft negative
“you want to avoid the massive cost and development overhead of heavy enterprise tools (like SAP or Salesforce Commerce Cloud)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce marketing · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 27 answers that named SAP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com12
cleanlist.ai6
cognism.com6
learn.g2.com5
pipeline.zoominfo.com5
worldmetrics.org5
capterra.com4
clearout.io4
findymail.com4
au.pcmag.com3
No domain is on file for SAP, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SAP stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SAP stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 135,000 a month (“sap”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 74,309 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 90 of 99 in CRM data quality
Segment leader
43%
Insycle
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 27 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow SAP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.