GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ataccama ONE · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Ataccama ONE

15Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ataccama ONE was named 4 times in CRM data quality and 1 other category, where Insycle led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market24 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise22 of 104

under the label threshold

In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ataccama ONE for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	0%	24 of 104	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%
Data management platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	107 of 183	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Segment at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ataccama ONE yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ataccama ONE across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“large enterprise with complex governance/compliance needs → Ataccama ONE” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CRM data quality · comparative prompt · alternative

“AI-assisted data preparation, real-time anomaly detection” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CRM data quality · comparative prompt · alternative

“Ataccama ONE (Enterprise) or Openprise” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ataccama ONE, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ataccama ONE was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DemandTools11 of 156Not in the top three

Cloudingo8 of 153Not in the top three

Talend8 of 150Not in the top three

Insycle7 of 152Not in the top three

ZoomInfo7 of 150Not in the top three

Informatica6 of 152Not in the top three

Collibra5 of 151Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Operations5 of 150Not in the top three

Apollo.io4 of 150Not in the top three

Cognism4 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ataccama ONE. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 15 answers that named Ataccama ONE and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cleanlist.ai2

cognism.com2

gitnux.org2

integrate.io2

ovaledge.com2

wifitalents.com2

blog.hubspot.com1

clearout.io1

darwinapps.com1

default.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Ataccama ONE came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-03-27-data-quality-tools2

cognism.com/blog/data-quality-software2

integrate.io/blog/top-10-data-cleansing-tools2

ovaledge.com/blog/data-quality-tools2

blog.hubspot.com/service/data-management-platform1

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-05-12-best-database-cleaning-software1

clearout.io/blog/crm-data-cleaning-solutions1

cognism.com/blog/data-enrichment-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ataccama ONE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ataccama ONE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ataccama.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.